Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "su2".
Did you mean:
su
2005 Aug 12
3
General expression of a unitary matrix
Hi, all,
Does anybody got the most general expression of a unitary matrix?
I found one in the book, four entries of the matrix are:
(cos\theta) exp(j\alpha); -(sin\theta)exp(j(\alpha-\Omega));
(sin\theta)exp(j(\beta+\Omega)); (cos\theta) exp(j\beta);
where "j" is for complex.
However, since for any two unitary matrices, their product should also
be a unitary matrix. When I
2014 Dec 08
3
[LLVMdev] ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
...areMemAccessesTriviallyDisjoint() called inside
MIsNeedChainEdge() allows this edge to be skipped.
This means that I get a case where
SU0
SU1, AliasChain
/\
/ \ // Aliasing memory accesses
SU2
all SUs have memory operands, but the underlying objects vectors are empty.
SU1 became AliasChain, added dep to SU2, and cleared the lists for aliasing memory accesses.
SU0 has a dependency towards SU2, but towards SU1 it is trivially disjoint, and therefore it gets
no dependency to SU1 and *neith...
2017 Sep 02
6
Strange lazy evaluation of default arguments
...here, l is set to u?s value
+ u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
+ l = l/sqrt(sigma2)
+ mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
+ print(c(u, l, mu))
+ }
>
> Su1()
[1] 100.00 100.00 0.53
[1] 23.2558140 23.2558140 0.1232558
In the first version, both u and l are correctly divided by 4.3.
2. Strange behavior:
> Su2 = function(u=100, l=u, mu=0.53, sigma2=4.3^2)
+ {
+ # print(c(u, l, mu))
+ u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
+ l = l/sqrt(sigma2) # here, l is set to u?s value
+ mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
+ print(c(u, l, mu))
+ }
>
> Su2()
[1] 23.2558140 5.4083288 0.1232558
In the second version, the print function...
2014 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
...eMemAccessesTriviallyDisjoint() called inside
>
> MIsNeedChainEdge() allows this edge to be skipped.
>
>
>
> This means that I get a case where
>
>
>
> SU0
>
>
>
> SU1, AliasChain
>
> /\
>
> / \ // Aliasing memory accesses
>
> SU2
>
>
>
> all SUs have memory operands, but the underlying objects vectors are
> empty.
>
> SU1 became AliasChain, added dep to SU2, and cleared the lists for
> aliasing memory accesses.
>
> SU0 has a dependency towards SU2, but towards SU1 it is trivially
> d...
2011 Nov 09
1
[LLVMdev] .debug_info section size in arm executable
On Nov 9, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
>>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not good, but people do it. Also constructing enums via & and | etc. It'd be nice to be able to get the name of whatever it is that the code generator actually produced :)
2014 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
...e() allows this edge to be skipped.
>>
>>
>>
>> This means that I get a case where
>>
>>
>>
>> SU0
>>
>>
>>
>> SU1, AliasChain
>>
>> /\
>>
>> / \ // Aliasing memory accesses
>>
>> SU2
>>
>>
>>
>> all SUs have memory operands, but the underlying objects vectors are
>> empty.
>>
>> SU1 became AliasChain, added dep to SU2, and cleared the lists for
>> aliasing memory accesses.
>>
>> SU0 has a dependency towards SU2,...
2017 Sep 02
0
Strange lazy evaluation of default arguments
...= l/sqrt(sigma2)
> + mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
> + print(c(u, l, mu))
> + }
>>
>> Su1()
> [1] 100.00 100.00 0.53
> [1] 23.2558140 23.2558140 0.1232558
>
> In the first version, both u and l are correctly divided by 4.3.
>
> 2. Strange behavior:
>
>> Su2 = function(u=100, l=u, mu=0.53, sigma2=4.3^2)
> + {
> + # print(c(u, l, mu))
> + u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
> + l = l/sqrt(sigma2) # here, l is set to u?s value
> + mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
> + print(c(u, l, mu))
> + }
>>
>> Su2()
> [1] 23.2558140 5.4083288 0.123...
2017 Sep 05
0
Strange lazy evaluation of default arguments
...rt(sigma2)
> + mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
> + print(c(u, l, mu))
> + }
> >
> > Su1()
> [1] 100.00 100.00 0.53
> [1] 23.2558140 23.2558140 0.1232558
>
> In the first version, both u and l are correctly divided by 4.3.
>
> 2. Strange behavior:
>
> > Su2 = function(u=100, l=u, mu=0.53, sigma2=4.3^2)
> + {
> + # print(c(u, l, mu))
> + u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
> + l = l/sqrt(sigma2) # here, l is set to u?s value
> + mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
> + print(c(u, l, mu))
> + }
> >
> > Su2()
> [1] 23.2558140 5.4083288 0.1...
2017 Sep 02
2
Strange lazy evaluation of default arguments
...c(u, l, mu))
>> + }
>>
>>>
>>> Su1()
>>>
>> [1] 100.00 100.00 0.53
>> [1] 23.2558140 23.2558140 0.1232558
>>
>> In the first version, both u and l are correctly divided by 4.3.
>>
>> 2. Strange behavior:
>>
>> Su2 = function(u=100, l=u, mu=0.53, sigma2=4.3^2)
>>>
>> + {
>> + # print(c(u, l, mu))
>> + u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
>> + l = l/sqrt(sigma2) # here, l is set to u?s value
>> + mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
>> + print(c(u, l, mu))
>> + }
>>
>>>...
2019 Oct 14
1
[PATCH] gm107/ir: fix loading z offset for layered 3d image bindings
...+ format->bits[3];
+ // Now we have "pred" which (optionally) contains whether to do the surface
+ // op at all, and a "pred2d" which indicates that, in case of doing the
+ // surface op, we have to create a 2d and 3d version, conditioned on pred2d.
+ TexInstruction *su2d = NULL;
+ if (pred2d) {
+ su2d = cloneForward(func, su)->asTex();
+ for (unsigned i = 0; su->defExists(i); ++i)
+ su2d->setDef(i, bld.getSSA());
+ su2d->moveSources(dim + 1, -1);
+ su2d->tex.target = nv50_ir::TEX_TARGET_2D;
+ }
+ if (pred2d &&am...
2017 Sep 02
0
Strange lazy evaluation of default arguments
...t(c(u, l, mu)) # here, l is set to u?s value
+? ?u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
+? ?l = l/sqrt(sigma2)
+? ?mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
+? ?print(c(u, l, mu))
+ }
Su1()
[1] 100.00 100.00? ?0.53
[1] 23.2558140 23.2558140? 0.1232558
In the first version, both u and l are correctly divided by 4.3.
2. Strange behavior:
Su2 = function(u=100, l=u, mu=0.53, sigma2=4.3^2)
+ {
+? ?# print(c(u, l, mu))
+? ?u = u/sqrt(sigma2)
+? ?l = l/sqrt(sigma2) # here, l is set to u?s value
+? ?mu = mu/sqrt(sigma2)
+? ?print(c(u, l, mu))
+ }
Su2()
[1] 23.2558140? 5.4083288? 0.1232558
In the second version, the print
function is comment...
2008 Oct 15
1
error during installworld on 7.1 beta (was: error during buildworld on 7.1 beta)
During installworld I get:
cat /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/ncurses.3x
> ncurses.3
sh /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/MKterminfo.sh
/usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/terminfo.head
/usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/include/Caps
2010 Mar 05
0
MGCP FXO endpoint
...5200,1,Dial(MGCP/aaln/S0/SU3/0 at ARMARIO11/111)
aaln/S0/SU3/0 --> is an endpoint at ARMARIO11
The problem is that asterisk detects try to find host ARMARIO11/111
instead of calling number 111 in that FXO port.
Here is the debug:
-- Executing [5200 at internal:1]
Dial("MGCP/aaln/S0/SU2/0 at Ignacio-1",
"MGCP/aaln/S0/SU3/0 at ARMARIO11/111") in new stack
[Mar 5 13:36:50] NOTICE[4659]: chan_mgcp.c:1753
find_subchannel_and_lock: Gateway 'ARMARIO11/111' (and thus its
endpoint 'aaln/S0/SU3/0') does not exist
[Mar 5 13:36:50] WARNING[4659]: chan_mgcp.c:...
2011 Apr 15
0
[LLVMdev] Scheduling - WAW Dependencies
...any of the nodes above it may
overwrite the flags created by DEC64_32rr, again, presumably because
JNE_4's CopyToReg takes care of moving DEC64_32rr's flag output to
EFLAGS.
Now we come to the actual problem. As far as the graph is concerned,
there is nothing preventing us from scheduling SU2 (DEC64_32rr) before
any of the other flag-affecting nodes, such as SU10. One such schedule
is 8-13-12-14-3-11-2-7-10-5-6-9-4-1-0 (which is, incidentally, what my
scheduler produces). However, when we look at the code generated from
such a schedule, we see this:
-------------------------------------...
2016 Aug 04
2
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] backlight: Avoid double fbcon backlight handling
...t;> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
>> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static int as3711_bl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> su->type == AS3711_BL_SU1 ?
>> "as3711-su1" : "as3711-su2",
>> &pdev->dev, su,
>> - &as3711_bl_ops, &props);
>> + &as3711_bl_ops, &props,
>> + BACKLIGHT_REGISTER_FB_CLIENT);
>> if (IS_ERR(bl)) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to regis...
2016 Jul 12
0
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] backlight: Avoid double fbcon backlight handling
...3a40bc8a85 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static int as3711_bl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> su->type == AS3711_BL_SU1 ?
> "as3711-su1" : "as3711-su2",
> &pdev->dev, su,
> - &as3711_bl_ops, &props);
> + &as3711_bl_ops, &props,
> + BACKLIGHT_REGISTER_FB_CLIENT);
> if (IS_ERR(bl)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register backlight\n");...
2016 Jun 30
6
[PATCH] backlight: Avoid double fbcon backlight handling
....c
index 734a9158946b..5f3a40bc8a85 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static int as3711_bl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
su->type == AS3711_BL_SU1 ?
"as3711-su1" : "as3711-su2",
&pdev->dev, su,
- &as3711_bl_ops, &props);
+ &as3711_bl_ops, &props,
+ BACKLIGHT_REGISTER_FB_CLIENT);
if (IS_ERR(bl)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register backlight\n");
return PTR_ERR(bl);
diff --...
2016 Aug 04
1
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] backlight: Avoid double fbcon backlight handling
.../video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/as3711_bl.c
> >> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static int as3711_bl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >> su->type == AS3711_BL_SU1 ?
> >> "as3711-su1" : "as3711-su2",
> >> &pdev->dev, su,
> >> - &as3711_bl_ops, &props);
> >> + &as3711_bl_ops, &props,
> >> + BACKLIGHT_REGISTER_FB_CLIENT);
> >> if (IS_ERR(bl)) {
> >> dev_err(&pdev-...