search for: studiously

In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed. So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us, when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?

Hello, First off, congratulations on the studious work with Ogg Vorbis. I have just a short question. I'm working on a project that would like to quickly gather some information about a file encoded with ogg vorbis. Specifically, the average bitrate and the length of the stream as a function of seconds. I've read, I think, that there is an average bitrate stored in the stream

...(maybe more?) Karnbir might have to tolerate my occasional short outbursts of humor as they help extend the lifespan of various pieces of equipment in my little nook. I'll let that go someday when I have milked it for all I think it's worth. ;-) 5) Additional delay because I'm reading studiously trying to learn new/updated admin related stuff. It seems that since security became a concern, the *necessary* bloat to functions is unbelievable (I'd be afraid to read the estimates of % of budget devoted to security nation- wide). 6) OTOH (there's always one, eh?) if the walkers-on-wate...

...ed to mark each word separately, which makes for something >200% overhead with just one word per vector. You can also do things like change the character set encoding mid-stream, should that ever make sense. Michael's example was mixed English and Klingon. (The Unicode Consortium has so far studiously ignored the Klingon encoding proposal.) I also think it would be possible to implement some of these features implicitly by always breaking xml document into ogg packets at the same level of the document heirarchy. One can also imagine various hacks to include a psuedo-header, prehaps as a comment...

Proposal That a new mailing list be established that pertains exclusively to R documentation. The purpose of the list would be to discuss weak sections of the documentation and establish fixes for those weak spots. Pro If it works, there would be better documentation. It would be an excellent opportunity for newish and/or less technical people to contribute to R. In some respects such people

..................................................... >> > > > > > > > > > > From: Jim Lemon <jim@bitwrit.com.au> > Date: 15 June 2009 9:01:29 PM > To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] a proposal regarding documentation > > > I was studiously ignoring this thread (I have way too much to do > already) but Gabor's suggestion reminded me that I have often found > the PHP/MySQL online help pages very ... well, helpful. I can't > recall the number of times I have scrolled down when I didn't quite > get it, and...