Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "stuartb".
Did you mean:
stuart
2017 Jul 05
1
Upstream details at...
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 at 18:45 -0000, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote:
> >
> >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html
I apparently wasn't clear about the issue. The problem is the CentOS
announcements f...
2017 Jul 03
3
Upstream details at...
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote:
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html
For a while now the "upstream details" pointed to in messages from
centos-announce have been saying:
Attention: RHN Hosted will reach the end of its service life on
July 31, 2017. Customers will be required to migrate
2015 Jul 05
0
ssh -X versus -Y
On 2015-06-26, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote:
[...]
> The documentation of the practical differences between -X and -Y is
> pretty obscure (mostly defering to the X Security extension
> documentation). I would like to see better clarification of the
> differences.
One practical difference I have seen is th...
2017 Jul 03
0
Upstream details at...
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stuart Barkley <stuartb at 4gh.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 at 08:00 -0000, centos-announce-request at centos.org wrote:
>
>> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1609.html
The following page refers to the same RHBA:
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1609
which will...
2015 Jun 26
3
ssh -X versus -Y
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 at 03:16 -0000, Alexandru Chiscan wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 11:51 PM, Stuart Barkley wrote:
> > Then from your desktop (assuming Linux already running X) in a
> > local xterm do something like:
> >
> > ssh -Y remote-system
>
> Do not use that because any user logged on the server can connect to
> your X server display and snoop what you
2014 Dec 16
0
rsync output under CentOS 6
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 at 11:41 -0000, Niamh Holding wrote:
> EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp.
>
> Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so
> their times should be in sync.
>
> EP> Check out the `--modify-window` option.
>
> Doesn't seem to stop all the folders being listed even though
2015 Apr 01
1
mirrors still catching up and -01.iso images?
I'm watching a couple of mirrors catch up with the 7.1 release and am
noticing some churn on the .iso images.
It appears that new -01.iso versions are coming downstream while some
of the mirrors apparently were getting different .iso images. The
-01.iso versions look to be significantly larger than the previous
non-01.iso versions (the -Minimal .iso appears to have gone from 560M
to 630M for
2015 Jun 25
0
An odd X question
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 at 15:55 -0000, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> I've got a headless server running CentOS 7. I've got a user who
> wants to run some graphical software on it, and view using x
> forwarding. What I don't have clear is how to set this up. I've just
> installed xorg-x11-server-[Xorg, common]. I assume I need to run X,
> but I don't see running this
2004 Jul 23
0
Pipecall problem
I have been a reseller & subscriber of pipecall since they started,
however I am really struggling to get pipecall to work for outbound or
inbound calls. I get errors that the registration has timed out.
I have tried many variations of the register command
register => 0845xxxxxxx@sipproxy.pipecall.com/1000
register => sipxxxxxxxxx:xxxxxxxxxx@sipproxy.pipecall.com/1000
2004 Jul 26
0
Sample extensions & SIP Conf files
I have got extreme problems with getting any incoming calls to ring
extensions, the sip debug info shows the CLI of the call coming in, but the
extensions do not ring, and the caller receives either a engaged tone or the
line is unobtainable depending on which provider is using.
I have used dozens of sample files to test, and I know I am doing it right
(aren't I?? :p) could one of you fine
2014 Oct 03
0
ShellShock and bash status
For those of us still in shell shock, the following was sent several
days ago under a misleading subject/thread mixed in with a bunch of
other nonsense. (Message-ID: <54291071.7010209 at centos.org>)
According to Johnny the second bash patch addressed all of the known
issues. I had been waiting for a third patch to come through and
missed this important information sent on Monday.
On
2004 Jul 24
1
Please help I fear I have missed something very important! but what?
Sorry about this, I have been struggling with the basics of my asterisk
config.
I set up two sip peers and two phones. And I set up lots of dial masks
for outgoing calls, all my outgoing calls were working great, however
incoming calls were a different matter altogether, I cannot get incoming
calls to work. So I have gone back to a very basic FWD config, with one
phone which as far as I am aware