Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "structually".
Did you mean:
structurally
2013 Nov 03
1
[LLVMdev] conditional flow resulting in "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
...my blocks look like this:
entry:
store 0, return_path
result = invoke func to defer_block unwind landing
landing:
landingpad
store 1, return_path
br defer_block
defer_block:
stuff
switch return_path, next_step [
0, next_step
1, rethrow
]
next_step:
val = load result ; error here
Structually the `next_step` has multiple preceding blocks, one of which
doesnt' define `result`. That results in the error. However, based on
the switching value `return_path` there is no way we can arrive at
`next_step` unless result has actually been set. Is there some way I can
tell LLVM this? Somehow j...
2004 Feb 10
0
Maybe this has already been discusses LDAPv3
I think I have already seen this discussed. If so, where is a good
"searchable" samba archive?
Does samba 3 work with LDAPv3?
I dumped my ldap database to ldif, and tried to add it to my test server
running openldap 2.1.22-8 and got all kinds of violation errors. i.e. no
structual objectclass provided, this was for my computer accounts, that
have top, posixAccount, sambaSAMAccount
2006 Dec 22
5
substitute creates an object which prints incorrectly (PR#9427)
The function "substitute" seems to fail to make a genuine
substitution, although the printed verision seems fine. Here is an
example.
> m <- substitute(Y <- function(x) FUN(x+1),
+ list(Y = as.name("y"), FUN = as.name("sin")))
> m
y <- function(x) sin(x + 1)
> eval(m)
> y
function(x) FUN(x+1)
However the story doesn't end there. The