search for: structizer

Simon, Have you looked at the control flow structizer that we have in the Open Source AMDIL backend? > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Simon Moll > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:01 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] OpenCL bac...

...ng block. The idea behind axtor was to make functions with arbitrary CFGs work on GPUs (usual exceptions apply: no fnc/block ptrs), such that a reliable OpenCL backend becomes feasible. On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:07 +0000, Villmow, Micah wrote: > Simon, > Have you looked at the control flow structizer that we have in the Open Source AMDIL backend? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > > On Behalf Of Simon Moll > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:01 PM > > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >...

Hi, this is a follow-up on my email from august (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-August/042737.html). i have, finally, released my OpenCL backend and control-flow restructuring framework for LLVM (AST-Extractor, or short axtor). The framework restructures function CFGs such that they can be expressed entirely without GOTOs or switch/loop-trickery. Hence, making it possible to

...tor was to make functions with arbitrary CFGs work on > GPUs (usual exceptions apply: no fnc/block ptrs), such that a reliable > OpenCL backend becomes feasible. > > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:07 +0000, Villmow, Micah wrote: > > Simon, > > Have you looked at the control flow structizer that we have in the > Open Source AMDIL backend? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu > > > [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > > > On Behalf Of Simon Moll > > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:01...