search for: strongest

I have a data frame with a couple million lines and want to retrieve the largest and second largest values in each row, along with the label of the column these values are in. For example row 1 strongest=-11072 secondstrongest=-11707 strongestantenna=value120 secondstrongantenna=value60 Below is the code I am using and a truncated data.frame. Retrieving the largest value was easy, but I have been getting errors every way I have tried to retrieve the second largest value. I have not even tried to...

...PM, <[60]mpward at illinois.edu> wrote: > I have a data frame with a couple million lines and want to retrieve > the largest and second largest values in each row, along with the > label of the column these values are in. For example > > row 1 > strongest=-11072 > secondstrongest=-11707 > strongestantenna=value120 > secondstrongantenna=value60 > > Below is the code I am using and a truncated data.frame. Retrieving > the largest value was easy, but I have been getting errors every way > I have t...

Hai, You may need to add the the following in krb5.conf [libdefaults] allow_weak_crypto = true ; for Windows 2003 ; default_tgs_enctypes = rc4-hmac des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 ; default_tkt_enctypes = rc4-hmac des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 ; permitted_enctypes = rc4-hmac des-cbc-crc des-cbc-md5 ; for Windows 2008 with AES default_tgs_enctypes = aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96

Does anyone knows which one is the strongest and which is the fastest encryption algorithms used in OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 from the list below aes128-cbc, 3des-cbc, blowfish-cbc, cast128-cbc, arcfour, aes192-cbc, aes256-cbc, rijndael-cbc at lysator.liu.se, aes128-ctr, aes192-ctr, aes256-ctr Strong Encryption OpenSSH supports 3DES, Blowfish, AES a...

...e via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: Hai Paul, hmm, i think its time.. to upgrade your samba. I dont think the other krb5.conf options work, but you might give it a try. See man krb5.conf, where i took it from. add /change in krb5.conf [kdc] tgt-use-strongest-session-key = BOOL svc-use-strongest-session-key = BOOL preauth-use-strongest-session-key= BOOL use-strongest-server-key = BOOL encode_as_rep_as_tgs_rep = BOOL BOOL = true or false. You might set the default windows encryption in krb5.conf as standard, but imo, that are changes...

...use I cant find the answer I have such problem: My data containing 4 variables (A,B,C,D) and are completed from 4 samples. Each of matrix is such: A B C D A 1 ab ac ad B ab 1 bc bd C ac bc 1 cd D ad bd cd 1 My hypothesis are that ad is the strongest correlation for A and for D (sign doesn't matter) bc is the strongest correlation for B and for C (sign doesn't matter) across samples. Is it possible test these hypothesis? Any help would be appreciated Rafa? Bartczuk bartczuk at kul.lublin.pl

Hai Paul,   hmm, i think its time.. to upgrade your samba.   I dont think the other krb5.conf options work, but you might give it a try. See man krb5.conf, where i took it from. add /change in krb5.conf  [kdc] tgt-use-strongest-session-key = BOOL svc-use-strongest-session-key = BOOL preauth-use-strongest-session-key= BOOL use-strongest-server-key = BOOL encode_as_rep_as_tgs_rep = BOOL   BOOL = true or false.   You might set the default windows encryption in krb5.conf as standard, but imo, that are changes which might giv...

...al; pop %rdi; " : : [offset] "i" (((unsigned long)&steal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, this asm foo isn't my strongest point). > >> +"setne %al;" > >> +"pop %rdx;" > >> +"pop %rdi;" > >> +FRAME_END > >> +"ret;" > >> +".popsection"); > >> + > >> +#endif > >> + > >> /* > &...

...al; pop %rdi; " : : [offset] "i" (((unsigned long)&steal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, this asm foo isn't my strongest point). > >> +"setne %al;" > >> +"pop %rdx;" > >> +"pop %rdi;" > >> +FRAME_END > >> +"ret;" > >> +".popsection"); > >> + > >> +#endif > >> + > >> /* > &...

...teal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); > >>> > >>> And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the > >>> push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, > >>> this asm foo isn't my strongest point). > >> Maybe: > >> > >> movsql %edi, %rax; > >> movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax; > >> cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); > >> setne %al; > >> > >> ? > > Yes, that looks good to me. > > > > Cheers, > >...

...teal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); > >>> > >>> And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the > >>> push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, > >>> this asm foo isn't my strongest point). > >> Maybe: > >> > >> movsql %edi, %rax; > >> movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax; > >> cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); > >> setne %al; > >> > >> ? > > Yes, that looks good to me. > > > > Cheers, > >...

...quot;i" (((unsigned long)&steal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); >> >> And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the >> push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, >> this asm foo isn't my strongest point). > Maybe: > > movsql %edi, %rax; > movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax; > cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); > setne %al; > > ? Yes, that looks good to me. Cheers, Longman

...quot;i" (((unsigned long)&steal_time) + offsetof(struct steal_time, preempted))); >> >> And if we could get rid of the sign extend on edi we could avoid all the >> push-pop nonsense, but I'm not sure I see how to do that (then again, >> this asm foo isn't my strongest point). > Maybe: > > movsql %edi, %rax; > movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rax,8), %rax; > cmpb $0, %[offset](%rax); > setne %al; > > ? Yes, that looks good to me. Cheers, Longman

...to upgrade your samba. > > I dont think the other krb5.conf options work, but you > might give it a try. > See man krb5.conf, where i took it from. > add /change in krb5.conf > > [kdc] > tgt-use-strongest-session-key = BOOL > svc-use-strongest-session-key = BOOL > preauth-use-strongest-session-key= BOOL > use-strongest-server-key = BOOL > encode_as_rep_as_tgs_rep = BOOL > > BOOL = true or false. > &g...

...ges too fast, throttling.. It appeared twiche on the same user during a period when the server was very high on CPU load I don't know if it is related, but the user later told me that Thunderbird forced a reload of all the messages. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. --Charles Darwin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkp4HOwACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZSIeACgrzXidrLIh783fr7...

...t a client who wants to go ssl. He's running a web server, smtp/pop, and ftps and imaps is coming as well. I'm looking for a wildcard ssl certificate i believe it's called but one on the budget plan. I am also wanting to ensure that the mod_ssl with httpd on the server is only using the strongest encryption methods and protocols. Thanks. Dave.

@triso because some of the engines, notably the two strongest, are not offered as native linux programs. i've updated my ubuntu 64-bit wine install script to use wine 1.3.13 http://www.jesseo.com/chess/64-bit-wine-ubuntu-1.3.13.sh i've gotten many engines to run from the terminal with this command "/home/USERNAME/wine64/wine" cmd.exe /K D...

Hi, Has anyone ever actually implemented a replicating iSCSI SAN using CentOS? I saw directions here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd It looks doable, but I am not the strongest linux person and would like to hear if anyone has tried and if there any caveats. Also, I noticed that these directions are for CentOS 5. Is it pretty much the same for CenOS 6? Lastly, this might sound crazy, but we are mostly a Hyper-V shop. Hyper-V supports CentOS 6.0-6.2 and 5.5-5.7. Could...

...ribution to analyze fishery data. To select the terms I use a routine where I first compare single term models to the null model (eg. U~1 vs. U~depth; U~1 vs. U~latitude; etc. ? where U= abundance) and, by means of the result given by a likelihook function applied for each comparison, I select the ?strongest? effect, let?s say depth. Then I run a new step comparing the U~depth vs. U~depth+latitude; U~depth vs. U~depth+... etc. Making this way I put the terms in ?magnitude? order. I tried to make a gaussian model using the step(glm.model) function to select the terms but I saw that in the output table...

Greetings, I am using rpart for classification with "class" method. The test data is the Indian diabetes data from package mlbench. I fitted a classification tree firstly using the original data, and then exchanged the order of Body mass and Plasma glucose which are the strongest/important variables in the growing phase. The second tree is a little different from the first one. The misclassification tables are different too. I did not change the data, but why the results are so different? Does anyone know how rpart deal with ties? Here is the codes for running the two tre...