search for: striing

Having worked through Four Days on Rails and the book Agile Web Development with Rails I decided it was time to start a live project. I have an existing application with MySQL database, so I modified the schema to use Rails standard column names. The main table was named ''applications''. ruby script/generate scaffold Application Admin results a stack overflow

I'm a bit confused as to how some of the values in a Sparc store instruction actually come to be set. The Sparc backend defines a store as: def STri : F3_2<3, 0b000100, (outs), (ins MEMri:$addr, IntRegs:$src), "st $src, [$addr]", [(store IntRegs:$src, ADDRri:$addr)]>; F3_2 and it's superclasses are defined as follows:

Further to my earlier message, I've now got both the Turlach solution & the Venables solution to work in R0.64.2 The as.name() conversion in the Venables solution is not needed. John Maindonald email : john.maindonald at anu.edu.au Statistical Consulting Unit, phone : (6249)3998 c/o CMA, SMS, fax : (6249)5549 John Dedman Mathematical

Suppose I have a target that does not have register+constant addressing mode. Then, I have DAG like: (store ..., (frameindex)) Targets like SPARC have the following patterns to catch this: def ADDRri : ComplexPattern<i32, 2, "SelectADDRri", [frameindex], []>; def STri : F3_2<3, 0b000100, (outs), (ins MEMri:$addr, IntRegs:$src),

These two subclasses of X86TargetMachine are basically identical. The *only* thing that's different is the constructor. And that *only* differs in the is64Bit argument that it passes to the X86TargetMachine constructor. Replacing the hard-coded 'true' or 'false' with 'Triple(TT).getArch()==Triple::x86_64' makes them *actually* identical. Can we just ditch the

On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Suppose I have a target that does not have register+constant > addressing mode. Then, I have DAG like: > > (store ..., (frameindex)) > > Targets like SPARC have the following patterns to catch this: > > def ADDRri : ComplexPattern<i32, 2, > "SelectADDRri", [frameindex], []>; > def STri :

Evan Cheng wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote: > >> >> Suppose I have a target that does not have register+constant >> addressing mode. Then, I have DAG like: >> >> (store ..., (frameindex)) >> >> Targets like SPARC have the following patterns to catch this: >> >> def ADDRri : ComplexPattern<i32, 2,

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 14:23 -0800, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi David, > > AFAIK, the answer is basically “because it’s always been that way.” I > seem to recall there were some things that were different (data layout > string and such), but that could also be parameterized if it hasn’t > been already by the recent refactorings, I suppose. It is *all* now parameterized. The classes

...'t safe to override the Module to substitute different target data. But I still think you should at least have the option to supply target data *without* overriding whatever comes in from the module. An even better question is: does it *ever* make sense to supply a blanket default target data striing? If no target-data option is supplied, wouldn't it be better to default to the target data for the running host? Or would that break existing code and/or tests?

On 28.01.2014 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: >> Hi there! >> >> I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the >> config: >> >> >> >> <idmap> >> >> <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> >>

Hi there! I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the config: <idmap> <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> <gid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> </idmap> As you can see the root in container is mapped to the root outside. I was expected to see no difference

Hi, I'm implementing __builtin_setjmp and __builtin_longjmp for Sparc 32 bit processors (64 bit later, time allowing). I'm basing the code on the PowerPC version, which itself is based on the X86 version. This code is very nearly working, and I've had it working for -O0 optimisation (with a slightly different version to that below), so I know it's close. However, the PowerPC

Hey folks, I''m just starting out learning Rails, so I picked up "Agile Web Development with Rails" and tried to get a demo server going. I entered the command C:\Sites\demo>rails server and got the following messages: => Booting WEBrick => Rails 3.0.7 application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown

>> Anyway, my present plan of attack is to have a "-defaulttarget" option >> with "none", "host", or a target string.  If -defaulttarget is not >> specified, the behavior of "opt" will be the same as it is presently. >> The defaulttarget will be overridden by the Module's target data if it >> has some.  "none"

Hi! I'm writing a new back-end for a new architecture. First, I'll do some "tests" with an existing back-end (I chose the Sparc back-end). My architecture has special address-registers and I want to add such new address-registers to my Sparc back-end. 1) I defined a new register call AddrRegs 2) I registered the class AddrRegs (addRegisterClass(MVT::iPTR, .. )) 3) I

Hi, I am discovering RoR with Ajax and have some problem. I wanted to use the helper "text_field_with_auto_complete" I didn t succed to obtain the visual render (a drop down list) like here "http://demo.script.aculo.us/ajax/autocompleter"<http://demo.script.aculo.us/ajax/autocompleter>. Here is the code I use: |# view Just a little test: <%=

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote: > Hi there! > > I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the > config: > > > > <idmap> > > <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> > > <gid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/> > >

Good afternoon I would like to ask if is possible somehow give more relevance to the recent documents in search results. I dont want to sort results according to the date, I still prefer relevance, but I would like to see recent documents with better scoring. I was trying to add search query using AND_MAYBE, which should use relevance from both subqueries, but it didnt add any benefit to the

On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Boris Boesler wrote: > Hi! > > I'm writing a new back-end for a new architecture. First, I'll do > some "tests" with an existing back-end (I chose the Sparc back-end). > My architecture has special address-registers and I want to add such > new address-registers to my Sparc back-end. > > 1) I defined a new register call

> > ./configure in the llvm package will work on my amd64 machine > with this command line: > > ./configure --prefix=$HOME --enable-optimized \ > --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2 > > Note that the CC and CXX flags are set on the command line, not as > environment variables - trying to submit them via the environment got me > all kinds of