search for: stricture

...panspec. I have found the following page to install using cpanspec, and all went well until I actually want to build the RPM's. Doesn't matter what I try to build I get the same problems with the man pages being missing, and nothing gets built. [root at lou cpanspec]# rpmbuild -ba perl-strictures.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.H8RqZz + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf strictures-2.000006 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/strictures-2.000006.tar.gz + /usr/bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd strict...

(I've just tried this on a second C7 box, literally clean install, only did it on Friday, with the same results) I'm replacing a dead F19 box with a new C7 one and I'm trying to get my Perl install completed. Ultimately, I need to get Selenium::Remote::Driver working, but I'm struggling before that. I started off as always by using RPM's for everything I possibly can. I

...ng gets > built. I'm afraid I'm not expert on these things - I tend to do the naughty thing of using CPAN to install in system locations! But I think the .spec file generated, or the variables used for the build are not quite correct. You can see here: > > Manifying blib/man3/strictures::extra.3pm > Manifying blib/man3/strictures.3pm > Installing /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-strictures-2.000006-1.el7.x86_64/root/perl5/lib/perl5/strictures.pm > Installing /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-strictures-2.000006-1.el7.x86_64/root/perl5/lib/perl5/strictures/extra.pm > Installi...

Woloshko, VCSC-Get it immediately - in next week there will be major promotions and it is expected to have high gains immediately over the next 10 days with massive promotions via fax starting wednesday evening throughout the week and weekend. This stock is Hot and is our number one pick for first quarter of 2005. Breaking NEWS: (VCSC)Vocalscape Announces License Agreement and Partnership with

...s. When I tried to incorporate what I need for failover following ISC documentation, and some people's guides, I discovered, I need more sophisticated structure of sections and subsections, which I figured out finally. But the annoying part was: in ISC documentation I failed to find general stricture of which section can appear inside which; like: a { b { c { } } } You can create each of sections/subsections following documentation, but to put them together making consistent config file you (I at least) have to figure on your own which section goes inside of which. </rant>...

...to get library updates (ala Fedora philosophy) becomes increasingly untenable. Then there is a further question, I'm afraid. Since CentOS also does specifically target the profile of a so-called 'enterprise/server-user' what does that actually entail. Does it mean concrete security strictures which bolt down non-'root' users or does it merely mean the availability of SELinux (but which can be turned OFF)? For instance, (with SELinux OFF), can a user still: (a) su root via Kterm anytime? (b) Access services-admin anytime via Menu+Pam to control printers, modems, daemons etc?...

...to incorporate what I need for > failover following ISC documentation, and some people's guides, I > discovered, I need more sophisticated structure of sections and > subsections, which I figured out finally. But the annoying part was: in > ISC documentation I failed to find general stricture of which section > can appear inside which; like: > > a { > b { > c { > > } > } > } > > You can create each of sections/subsections following documentation, but > to put them together making consistent config file you (I at least) have > to figure...