search for: stricto

...ng tuntaposx by hand on the said MacPro, I see that the kernel module is apparently built for x86_64 systems: macintosh MacOS ?? pwd /Library/Extensions/tun.kext/Contents/MacOS macintosh MacOS ?? file tun tun: Mach-O 64-bit kext bundle x86_64 Because YES! The system is running on an i386 (not stricto sensus) CPU (or maybe am I misinterpreting the meaning of "Darwin macpro 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 " ?). Has anyone heard of an OS X tun/tap driver which could work on 32 bits platforms?

...ng tuntaposx by hand on the said MacPro, I see that the kernel module is apparently built for x86_64 systems: macintosh MacOS ?? pwd /Library/Extensions/tun.kext/Contents/MacOS macintosh MacOS ?? file tun tun: Mach-O 64-bit kext bundle x86_64 Because YES! The system is running on an i386 (not stricto sensus) CPU (or maybe am I misinterpreting the meaning of "Darwin macpro 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 " ?). Has anyone heard of an OS X tun/tap driver which could work on 32 bits platforms?

...I see > that the kernel module is apparently built for x86_64 systems: > > macintosh MacOS ?? pwd > /Library/Extensions/tun.kext/Contents/MacOS > macintosh MacOS ?? file tun > tun: Mach-O 64-bit kext bundle x86_64 > > > Because YES! The system is running on an i386 (not stricto sensus) CPU > (or maybe am I misinterpreting the meaning of > "Darwin macpro 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 > PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 > " ?). > > Has anyone heard of an OS X tun/tap driver which could work on 32 bits &gt...

Dear List, Would anyone know how to perform prepared queries with ROBC ? I had a shot with some of the internal (non-exported) functions of the package but ended up with a segfault, so I prefer asking around before experimenting further... Thanks, Laurent