Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "strictintegrateda".
Did you mean:
strictintegratedas
2014 Feb 21
3
[LLVMdev] IAS and inline assembly
(Sorry about the duplicate, I got the mailing list address incorrect the
first time around).
While working on the IAS, I ran into a behavioural difference between GCC
and clang.
The Linux Kernel relies on GCC's acceptance of inline assembly as an opaque
object which will not have any validation performed on the content. The
current behaviour in LLVM is to perform validation of the contents
2014 Feb 21
2
[LLVMdev] IAS and inline assembly
...d prefer would be
>
> * Have the driver pass -no-integrated-as when given -S but not -integrated-
> as. That is, -no-integrated-as is always the default for -S in clang. This has the
> big advantage that parsing assembly is still just a on/off switch.
> * Have a second TargetOption: StrictIntegratedAS. Have the driver set that
> based on -S/-c and -integrated-as/-no-integrated-as. With this option we
> downgrade assembly parsing errors to warnings and fallback to EmitRawText,
> but without ever calling hasRawTextSupport. I believe this is equivalent to
> Renato's proposal.
>...