search for: strenght

...T". Also, I try to use "polar.plot" of the package poltrix with the same matrix, but angles are not display because of many NAs. Does any one know how what should be the right NA action to get results in these two cases ? # Example of data set of theta in radians day measure strenght theta.1 theta.2 theta.3 theta.4 1 1 1 4.101523742 4.71238898 5.393067389 4.276056667 2 1 2 2.583087293 0 NA NA 3 1 1 3.385938749 3.769911184 4.380776423 NA 4 1 2 1.239183769 0.680678408 1.570796327 NA 5 1 4 3.50...

Hi people! I have a few problems with the password strength in Samba. I have a PDC with LDAP on Debian Stable, with a few packages from backports. The problem is that I can't find a way to enforce strenght to the passwords of the users. I can't define a policy to force things like: number of uppercase letters, number of downcase letters, number of numbers in the password, to check the diference between the new and the old, to store a list of old passwords to check... I mean, things that are...

My % of packets lost vary usually in function of signal strenght. Since i cannot forecast the % of frames i will lost except with the criteria just said, could be a good approach to set the PLC tuning % dynamically during runtime basing it statistically on the number of ACKed frames? Does the % of frames lost include silence frames (6 bytes frames, i'm using...

...entOS 4.4 ? I have started using it today (unimportant stuff for now, for testing), and am wondering what are other people experiences with it. I'm using version 1.4.1, rpms kindly provided by Karan on his repository. My main concern is data loss, not security itself. From what I noticed, the strenght of CFS crypto is less than optimal. CFS right now looks like a very convenient solution. Much easier than the losetup stuff (which is a PITA). TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stall...

...- > I haven't seen a machine in which OR is faster than ADD nor more energy-efficient. They're all done by the same ALU circuitry which delays the pipeline by its worstcase path timing. So, for modern processor hardware purposes, OR is exactly equal ADD. Transforming ADD to OR isn't strenght reduction at all. Maybe this is benefical only if you have a backend generating circuitry (programming FPGAs). I believe that in cases where ADD and OR are equivalent, LLVM prefers the latter because it's easier to reason about the bits in the result of an OR in complex cases. The x86 backend,...

...r. Simple and to the point. It really covers the basics of > Ruby that you absolutely need to know about Ruby before doing real > stuff on Rails. Needs a lot of work in the presentation before > publishing to a tree form tough. Think the presentation and layout was > one of the biggest strenght of the Agile book. > > Would love a summary on what''s going to be in the whole book though. > TOC would be nice. > > And I''m definitely getting that magazine. Can''t I write something for > it and get a free copy in exchange? ;)

.... > I haven't seen a machine in which OR is faster than ADD nor more energy-efficient. They're all done by the same ALU circuitry which delays the pipeline by its worstcase path timing. So, for modern processor hardware purposes, OR is exactly equal ADD. Transforming ADD to OR isn't strenght reduction at all. Maybe this is benefical only if you have a backend generating circuitry (programming FPGAs). > > > - Is there a straight forward way to know if an instruction belongs to > a > > loop? (just curiosity) > > I'll defer to others on this one. > > &...

...roups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b6f55s%24256q%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=6> and the rationale for what I am trying to do here <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=rsync&m=105660948415347&w=2> Down to what I am asking help with: I am _not_ a C hacker at all, my strenghts are Perl -- if anywhere at all. So I would appreciate your advise before I shoot myself in the foot. Thanks for your patience. I have studied the sources and gotten down to sender.c (cvs 1.17), in particular the line where it calls do_open() and I am intending to create do_popen as an altern...

...the tags, > it will go in the PICTURE metadata block in upcoming FLAC 1.1.3: > http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/flac/flac/doc/html/changelog.html > I assume that this could be added later via metaflac to already encoded files? btw: are there any other changes (e.g. in encoding strenght or so) that makes it worth waiting for 1.1.3? Thanks and best wishes, Chris. :-)

Hi Daniel, > Hi folks, > > I couldn't find a specific XOR (OR and AND) optimization on llvm, and > therefore I am about to implement it. > But first I would like to check with you guys that it really does not exist. > > For a simple loop like this: > > nbits = 128; > bit_addr = 0; > while(nbits--) > { > bindex=bit_addr>>5; /* Index is

...'t seen a machine in which OR is faster than ADD nor more > energy-efficient. They're all done by the same ALU circuitry which delays > the pipeline by its worstcase path timing. So, for modern processor hardware > purposes, OR is exactly equal ADD. Transforming ADD to OR isn't strenght > reduction at all. Maybe this is benefical only if you have a backend > generating circuitry (programming FPGAs). > > I believe that in cases where ADD and OR are equivalent, LLVM prefers the > latter because it's easier to reason about the bits in the result of an OR > in co...

...e that this could be added later via metaflac to already > encoded files? yes. it's best if you know that you are going to add afterward to encode with enough padding (flac -P option) for it so that the addition can be made in-place. > btw: are there any other changes (e.g. in encoding strenght or so) > that makes it worth waiting for 1.1.3? I keep that changelog up-to-date with each checkin, so everything is in there. the rest of the stuff before the release will be bug fixes. Josh ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored...

hello, Does our beloved Centos project have a page where one can request that an RPM package be built, especially for C5? How about alerts when those requests have been satisfied? I know about 3rd party repos like rpmforge, epel, and kbextras. I can search those in YUM. Centos seems to have specialized as a server OS in the past, but my experience is that it is an up and coming

Two announcements, so I''ll split this post into two pieces: MR. NEIGHBORLY''S RUBY AND RAILS NOW IN BETA ========================================= My Ruby on Rails book is now in beta. You can roll on over to the website for more information and pricing: http://www.rubyonrailsbook.com/ Here''s a rundown: Beta eBook is available now, print hopefully in July sometime.

Hi, I have Samba 3.0.13 running on Suse 9.2 on an i586. I can browse and connect to the Samba shares on the Linux machine from Windows XP and Mac OSX. However, about 1 min after connecting, the shares are lost and gone from the network environment - same for Windows XP and Mac OSX. From time to time, they "re-appear" only to be gone after another minute or so. The Windows shares

Josh Coalson wrote: >> III) I've read about the CUEsheet feature of flac where you can store >> the data of cuesheets (at least indices and so) as searchpoints in >> flac. >> But the format seems to be in milliseconds while in CDDA frames are >> exact. >> Is it (because one would have rounding errors) not adivsable to use >> this >> feature, and

But even for a very simple loop: int test1 (int *x, int *y, int *z, int k) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 10; i < k; i++) { z[i] = x[i] / y[i]; } return sum; } The initial value of induction variable is not zero after compiling with -O3 -mcpu=power8 x.cpp -S -c -emit-llvm -fno-unroll-loops (see bottom of the email for IR) Also I can write somewhat more complicated loop where step

...ich  > a division doesn't do), has to execute (a division is an obvious DCE  > candidate), cannot be hoisted (hoisting divisions is awesome), etc. Perhaps  > most importantly, though, a patchpoint doesn't tell LLVM that you're *doing  > a division* - so all constant folding, strenght reduction, and algebraic  > reasoning flies out the window. On the other hand, spilling all state to  > the stack is an arguably sound and performant solution to a lot of VM  > problems. I've seen JVM implementations that ensure that there is always a  > copy of state on the stack a...

...ch a division doesn't do), has to execute (a > division is an obvious DCE candidate), cannot be hoisted (hoisting > divisions is awesome), etc. Perhaps most importantly, though, a > patchpoint doesn't tell LLVM that you're *doing a division* - so all > constant folding, strenght reduction, and algebraic reasoning flies > out the window. On the other hand, spilling all state to the stack is > an arguably sound and performant solution to a lot of VM problems. > I've seen JVM implementations that ensure that there is always a copy > of state on the stack...

On 04/29/2014 12:39 PM, Filip Pizlo wrote: > On April 29, 2014 at 11:27:06 AM, Philip Reames > (listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>) wrote: >> On 04/29/2014 10:44 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote: >>> LD;DR: Your desire to use trapping on x86 only further convinces me >>> that Michael's proposed intrinsics are the best way to go.