search for: strecker

...ox-Stuart test for trend detects a trend but gives a p-value of 1. Isn't there a distribution-free, exact test for trend which operates on the rank-oder of the data instead of binary coded values? Please apologize for asking a rather R-unspecific question. Thanks in advance Stefan --- Stefan Strecker Universitaet Karlsruhe (TH) Department of Economics and Business Engineering Chair for Information Management and Systems Englerstrasse 14 D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T: +49 721 608 8374 F: +49 721 608 8399 M: +49 179 69 29 746 http://www.iw.uni-karlsruhe.de DH PGP Key available upon request

...ction"), function runFunction, file MCJIT.cpp, line 180." echo -e '#include <iostream>\nextern "C" {void *__dso_handle = NULL;} int main(){ std::cout << "hello" << std::endl; }' | clang -cc1 -emit-llvm-bc -x c++ | lli -use-mcjit --- Jaymie Strecker jstrecker at kosada.com

...struct argument, I'm having to convert the argument value (the original struct type) to match the parameter type (which could be any of the above variations). Is there a unified way to work with all these variations? Or is there a way to avoid generating them in the first place? --- Jaymie Strecker jstrecker at kosada.com

Hello, my data is an ordered list of observations where each observation is either of condition "efficient" (coded as 1) or "non-efficient" (0) as e.g. No. Obs Condition 1 1.1 0 2 1.2 1 3 1.4 1 4 1.5 0 5 2.5 1 etc. My goal is to plot a single line with lty='o' but different symbols for either condition whenever condition is 1 or 0, i.e. on the x-axis the

Le 14 déc. 2012 à 17:08, Jaymie Strecker <jstrecker at kosada.com> a écrit : > Duncan, thanks for your reply. > >> Probably the types are not defined precisely the same in each module (maybe you >> could send the exact definitions in each module to the mailing list?), > > > In the module loaded in St...

Duncan, thanks for your reply. > Probably the types are not defined precisely the same in each module (maybe you > could send the exact definitions in each module to the mailing list?), In the module loaded in Step 1 (otherModule): %struct.dispatch_group_s = type opaque %union.dispatch_object_t = type { %struct.dispatch_object_s* } %struct.dispatch_object_s = type opaque In the

Hello, can someone please help me with coding a function for a bootstrap WMW test (package boot, R under Windows, version 1.6.2)?

...etypes IR objects". Except that I would have expected the Linker to recognize that the `dispatch_object_t` type in the loaded module and the generated code are the same. Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug in LLVM? (I have LLVM 3.1, Mac OS X 10.6.) Thanks for your time. --- Jaymie Strecker jstrecker at kosada.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121213/2f387c8f/attachment.html>

Hi there! I''ve just migrated from rails 2.3.5 to 2.3.8 and now I have a lot (and I mean a lot!) of deprecation warnings like this one: "DEPRECATION WARNING: ActionView::SafeBuffer is deprecated! Use ActiveSupport::SafeBuffer instead." But I don''t understand how to remove this. I searched through installed plugins, and there is no reference to SafeBuffer :( Any

Hi everybody, I have several VMs running on Xenserver 6.5 I have 2 samba servers (1 DC & 1 Fileserver). They are both running Debian Linux 8.2 Jessie. I'm using the samba debian package (4.1.17) My VM has 8G RAM and 4 vCPU How can i test if the performances are quite good or not? with reading/writing Could I have better performance with the latest samba release? thanks Pierre --

Under Solaris 10 on a 4 core Sun Ultra 40 with 20GB RAM, I am setting up a Sun StorageTek 2540 with 12 300GB 15K RPM SAS drives and connected via load-shared 4Gbit FC links. This week I have tried many different configurations, using firmware managed RAID, ZFS managed RAID, and with the controller cache enabled or disabled. My objective is to obtain the best single-file write performance.