Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "stream_offset".
2004 Sep 10
1
problems with flac?
...ples
minimum framesize: 2066 bytes
maximum framesize: 13776 bytes
sample_rate: 44100 Hz
channels: 2
bits-per-sample: 16
total samples: 25162872
MD5 signature: 86a3934bfd09db5c9475a6db777ef5b1
METADATA block #1
type: 3 (SEEKTABLE)
is last: false
length: 1278
seek points: 71
point 0: sample_number=0, stream_offset=0,
frame_samples=4608
point 1: sample_number=442368, stream_offset=561277,
frame_samples=4608
point 2: sample_number=889344, stream_offset=1247829,
frame_samples=4608
point 3: sample_number=1331712, stream_offset=1968819,
frame_samples=4608
point 4: sample_number=1778688, stream_offset=2769020,
fra...
2007 Jul 25
3
FLAC: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch
Hi
I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode it to WAV
it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch
So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message above
still decodable to WAV (and how can you do this, because flac.exe doesn't
want to decode the file), even if there is a MD5 signature mismatch, or is
this not possible at all?
thx
2004 Sep 10
2
Serious bug in FLAC
...ware that sues libFLAC
2. I found that libFLAC was always painfully seeking from the start
3. I found that it did this because it always concluded that the
sample needed was in the first block at the front of the file.
4. I found that the SEEKTABLE for my .flac looks like this:
sample_number: 0 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
sample_number: 110592 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
sample_number: 221184 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
sample_number: 331776 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
sample_number: 442368 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
sample_number: 552960 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0...
2004 Sep 10
0
Serious bug in FLAC
...nd that libFLAC was always painfully seeking from the start
>
> 3. I found that it did this because it always concluded that the
> sample needed was in the first block at the front of the file.
>
> 4. I found that the SEEKTABLE for my .flac looks like this:
>
> sample_number: 0 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 110592 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 221184 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 331776 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 442368 stream_offset: 0 frame_samples: 0
> sample_number: 552960 stream_o...
2013 Jan 10
1
Fixing corrupt flac files
...ze: 14 bytes
maximum framesize: 15637 bytes
sample_rate: 44100 Hz
channels: 2
bits-per-sample: 16
total samples: 5857656
MD5 signature: eed0112053a62bbe0734502ef9a4b0b0
METADATA block #1
type: 3 (SEEKTABLE)
is last: false
length: 234
seek points: 13
point 0: sample_number=0, stream_offset=0, frame_samples=4608
point 1: sample_number=446976, stream_offset=1314129, frame_samples=4608
point 2: sample_number=898560, stream_offset=2663921, frame_samples=4608
point 3: sample_number=1350144, stream_offset=4059085, frame_samples=4608
point 4: sample_number=1801728, stream_of...
2013 Jan 10
4
Fixing corrupt flac files
So, let's provide some information then :-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
soa2ii at thor /mnt/files/music/Slime/Alle gegen Alle $ flac -aF 02\
St?rtebecker.flac
flac 1.2.1, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007 Josh Coalson
flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are
welcome
2010 Jul 30
33
[PATCHES] Smartjog PatchDump
Hello,
I work at SmarctJog.com, we have here some patches on IceCast for
performance and reliability, these are mostly client/connection/source
cleanups (a slave merge is underway, and some more good stuff (c)),
but we'd like this to be merged in before the list gets any longer.
Please find attached a list of our patches with a short desc:
This one is actually not from us/me, it was found
2010 Feb 09
4
Win32 and ELF created files are different
...n something (Not audio data).
Looking at this, I used a Windows native installation to check about this and confirmed that the flac.exe in Windows is also creating a file that differs a little than the flac ELF. At first glance I compared the metadata and it seemed that metaflac returned different stream_offsets from the seektable, comparing the same music file created with flac-win and flac-lin. Then I removed entirely both their tags & padding, but they still are different.
Is this normal? Music data is absolutely untouched, however, can this be an architecture difference between the compilers tha...
2007 Jul 25
1
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
...esize: 14 bytes
maximum framesize: 16394 bytes
sample_rate: 44100 Hz
channels: 2
bits-per-sample: 16
total samples: 332800
MD5 signature: baa7a6600e90050735e6e52437fca10f
METADATA block #1
type: 3 (SEEKTABLE)
is last: false
length: 18
seek points: 1
point 0: sample_number=0, stream_offset=0, frame_samples=4096
METADATA block #2
type: 4 (VORBIS_COMMENT)
is last: false
length: 223
vendor string: reference libFLAC 1.2.0 20070715
comments: 5
comment[0]: REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS=89.0 dB
comment[1]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_GAIN=-12.88 dB
comment[2]: REPLAYGAIN_TRACK_PE...
2004 Sep 10
2
better seeking
...E) / 8 + 128 + 2);
+ upper_bound_sample = total_samples;
/*
* Now we refine the bounds if we have a seektable with
@@ -882,7 +884,7 @@
}
if(i >= 0) { /* i.e. we found a suitable seek point... */
lower_bound = first_frame_offset + decoder->private_->seek_table->points[i].stream_offset;
- lower_seek_point = i;
+ lower_bound_sample = decoder->private_->seek_table->points[i].sample_number;
}
/* find the closest seek point > target_sample, if it exists */
@@ -892,76 +894,25 @@
}
if(i < (int)decoder->private_->seek_table->num_points) { /* i.e...
2006 Oct 28
3
better seeking
...);
+ upper_bound_sample = total_samples > 0 ? total_samples : target_sample;
/*
* Now we refine the bounds if we have a seektable with
@@ -2981,7 +2983,7 @@
}
if(i >= 0) { /* i.e. we found a suitable seek point... */
lower_bound = first_frame_offset + seek_table->points[i].stream_offset;
- lower_seek_point = i;
+ lower_bound_sample = seek_table->points[i].sample_number;
}
/* find the closest seek point > target_sample, if it exists */
@@ -2991,98 +2993,32 @@
}
if(i < (int)seek_table->num_points) { /* i.e. we found a suitable seek point... */
upper...
2005 Jan 25
0
bitbuffer optimizations
...= total_samples > 0 ? total_samples : target_sample;
/*
* Now we refine the bounds if we have a seektable with
@@ -923,7 +925,7 @@
}
if(i >= 0) { /* i.e. we found a suitable seek point... */
lower_bound = first_frame_offset + decoder->private_->seek_table->points[i].stream_offset;
- lower_seek_point = i;
+ lower_bound_sample = decoder->private_->seek_table->points[i].sample_number;
}
/* find the closest seek point > target_sample, if it exists */
@@ -933,98 +935,33 @@
}
if(i < (int)decoder->private_->seek_table->num_points) { /* i.e...
2006 Nov 03
2
better seeking
...h;
+ upper_bound_sample = total_samples > 0 ? total_samples : target_sample;
/*
* Now we refine the bounds if we have a seektable with
@@ -2981,7 +2978,7 @@
}
if(i >= 0) { /* i.e. we found a suitable seek point... */
lower_bound = first_frame_offset + seek_table->points[i].stream_offset;
- lower_seek_point = i;
+ lower_bound_sample = seek_table->points[i].sample_number;
}
/* find the closest seek point > target_sample, if it exists */
@@ -2991,98 +2988,36 @@
}
if(i < (int)seek_table->num_points) { /* i.e. we found a suitable seek point... */
upper...
2007 Jul 25
2
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain
option, I get a warning about the --no-padding
option...
"NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding"
...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the
file does end up with a small padding block, so
changing tags is slow.
I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4,
but forgot to submit the
2004 Sep 10
4
bitbuffer optimizations
Ok, here is a patch waiting for new CVS :). It works fine for me, but
please check it before commiting...
--
Miroslav Lichvar
-------------- next part --------------
--- src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c.orig 2003-01-30 17:36:01.000000000 +0100
+++ src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c 2003-01-30 21:53:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -51,6 +51,25 @@
*/
static const unsigned FLAC__BITBUFFER_DEFAULT_CAPACITY = ((65536 - 64) *
2014 Nov 25
19
flac-1.3.1pre1
Hi all,
As people may have seen there's a pre-release here:
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/
Specifically:
flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code
flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries
Please test.
I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries
which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately
there is a bug