search for: stratissoftwaredesign

Warren Young wrote: > [...] >>> What do they suggest as a replacement? > > Stratis: https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Can I use that now? > The main downside to Stratis I see is that it looks like 1.0 is scheduled to coincide with RHEL 8, based on the release dates of RHELs past, which means it won?t have any kind of redundant storage options to begin with, not even RAID-1, the only meaningful RAID level...

...lose > is > ZFS, and removing btrfs alltogether would be taking living in the past too > many > steps too far. Red Hat are working on a new user space wrapper and volume format based on md, device mapper, LVM, and XFS. http://stratis-storage.github.io/ https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf It's an aggressive development schedule and as so much of it is journaling and CoW based I have no way to assess whether it ends up with its own set of problems, not dissimilar to Btrfs. We'll just have to see. But if there are underlying guts in the device-mapper that do things better...

...ing btrfs alltogether would be taking living in the past too >> many >> steps too far. > > Red Hat are working on a new user space wrapper and volume format > based on md, device mapper, LVM, and XFS. > http://stratis-storage.github.io/ > https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf > > It's an aggressive development schedule and as so much of it is > journaling and CoW based I have no way to assess whether it ends up So in another 15 or 20 years, some kind of RH file system might become usable. I?d say the need to wake up because the need for features provi...

...e point at which I?d have to look for yet another >> distribution. The only one ramaining is arch. openSUSE defaults to btrfs on root, though XFS on /home for some reason: https://goo.gl/Hiuzbu >> What do they suggest as a replacement? Stratis: https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf The main downside to Stratis I see is that it looks like 1.0 is scheduled to coincide with RHEL 8, based on the release dates of RHELs past, which means it won?t have any kind of redundant storage options to begin with, not even RAID-1, the only meaningful RAID level when it comes to comparing...