search for: straces

Sorry for the delay Jeremy. I ran strace on the lowest pid for smbd (I ran "pidof smbd" to get pids, and used the lowest one of the 4 or so that came up). Command was "strace -f -o strace.log `ls /proc/2019/task/ | xargs -n 1 echo -n " -p`". I then copied a 1.3GB file from the server to my client to generate traffic. The resulting file was around 93k lines (15MB).

06.11.2024 12:32, Gilles via samba ?????: > On 06/11/2024 08:04, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Take a closer look at strace.? You've already noticed >> the recv() call takes a noticeable time, - find all of >> them. >> >> BTW, in your strace output you omitted some important >> pieces, for example, it isn't visible what FD#5 corresponds >> to, since

On 06/11/2024 08:04, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Take a closer look at strace.? You've already noticed > the recv() call takes a noticeable time, - find all of > them. > > BTW, in your strace output you omitted some important > pieces, for example, it isn't visible what FD#5 corresponds > to, since you omitted its creation/open. > > The prob might not be the (host)

On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:56 +0800, Kevin Laurie wrote: > Hey Joseph > Thanks. Strace seems like a very useful tool > Only problem is that I dont think it is maintained on ubuntu. > Tried to run:- > apt-get install strace but could not download it. > Might need to download and build it. Do you know any other way of getting > it? > Thanks > Kevin A. try apt-cache search

Greetings, all. I am trying to join a samba4 server to an existing Windows SBS 2003 domain as a DC. I've compiled samba4 from git and am following the howto. On what is essentially the first step, I get a "failed to connect" error with an ldap:// url, and the message NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT. In reviewing an strace, it looks to me like it might be trying to connect to the wrong IP.

Thanks Aki, Please find attached strace for imap and quota-status which report an error at the end. Regards, - Eric Grammatico _/) 13 mars 2019 12:23 "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> a ?crit: > The doveadm command seems to have worked. Can you retry with imap? > > strace /usr/lib/dovecot/imap -u victim > > Aki > > On 13.3.2019 12.58, Eric

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2766 ------- Additional Comments From paul@debian.org 2005-06-02 08:47 ------- It seems to be looping in userspace (no system calls, hence strace doesn't show anything). Could you try ltrace instead of strace, that should show what library functions (if any) are being called which may help. -- Configure bugmail:

Hello, I have found, that ocfs2 is very slow when doing I/O operation without cache. See a simple test: ng-vvv1:~# dd if=/data/verejna/dd-1G bs=1k | dd of=/dev/null 1048576+0 records in 1048576+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 395.183 s, 2.7 MB/s 2097152+0 records in 2097152+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 395.184 s, 2.7 MB/s The underlying block device is quite

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-22 20:46 ------- Could you please try to strace your iptables and see if there is some error during the gesockopt/setsockopt system call when the erroneous counter values are returned? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on

06.11.2024 08:59, Gilles via samba wrote: >>> FWIW, there's no delay after I run it once? but only for a couple of minutes. >> >> This suggests it might be a name resolution issue. > > What files could help find the source of the problem? That's a strange question. Without understanding what the actual problem is, it's hardly possible to point to the

>could you do a closer look at your smbd (maybe with truss or strace) >to see what exactly happens? Hi Chris. Do you mind if I butt in on this thread? I am currently fighting tooth and nail with Samba and I am attempting to do an strace on it myself...to no avail. When I start Samba with "strace -ff -o trace.out smbd -D", the program starts, but I cannot connect to the service

Topic: strace casues hardlock. no kernel panic. userland tool Category: kernel Program: strace Affects: FreeBSD releases 5.x and later. problem: When a normal user (or root user) users strace on certain binarys, the system will hardlock up, with no kernel panic. (numlock doesnt turn on and off, no ssh or console access). Im using strace from the ports

Hi there, Well.. I didn't find a way to strace imap. If I well understood, the faulty IMAP is launched by dovecot from or after a succesfull imap-login process. I have executed manually '/usr/libexec/dovecot/imap -u eric' and typed getquotaroot "INBOX" which didn't reproduce the error seen in the dovecot logs and reported the correct quota. Any idea how to find the imap

Hello, I am trying to get some more information about the following issue: # strace -p 2256 attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted I am trying to trace an mdadm re-sync pid and I keep getting the above error. I have done some digging on google and forums, but have not had much luck. Redhat-release says CentOS release 5.5 (Final) uname: 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 Any help

Hello, We use rsync to synchronize a large folder hierarchy between servers. Sometimes we notice that the permissions of some directories end up being wrong after rsync is run. The source directory has permissions 755 while target permissions sometimes end up being 700. We are using the --timeout option of rsync, and we have additional watchdog process that will terminate the process if a total

We have a dovecot install that is working fine for everyone except one user, who complains that it takes a minute or longer to delete a single message from the INBOX to Trash. This is happening for him from multiple IMAP clients so it appears to be server-side. I wanted to start up a test instance of dovecot alongside the production one and test there. So I copied dovecot.conf, put imap on

...l, httpd, ...) starts eating 100% of cpu while doing nothing. That slows down a VPS a lot. When examined with lsof, all of such processes have at least one tcp connection in close_wait state. Touching such process with strace -p makes it spring back to life and it goes on working normaly. Sendmail straces are specialy interesting, because I can see it wants to continue smtp dialogue somewhere from the middle. I suspect the cpu usage I see is the process trying to read from tcp socket to which the other end has nothing more to write. But as this is not happening in userspace (where I would see recv()...

I still see 2.5.5 hangs where the destination rsync exits (for whatever reason -- I don't see any errors) and the source waits on something forever. The interesting thing about it is when I strace the child rsync pid on the source side then rsync exits as it should. Strace must introduce a timing delay of some sort that allows one of the processes to properly detect the end of channel. I

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Kevin writes: > Appreciate if you could help with this. I have been trying to address this > "slow search" issue for a while with very limited success(I was trying to > implement FTS also), so I will appreciate if you could support. When I'm stumped, one of the diagnostic tools I use is process tracing. Connect via IMAP, in another window/session process trace the IMAP