search for: stornext

? Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:16:54 +1100 Michael Milton <ttmigueltt at gmail.com> ?????: > Is this a bug in the `dyn.load` implementation for R? If not, why is > it behaving like this? What should I do about it? On Unix-like systems, dyn.load forwards its arguments to dlopen(). It should be possible to confirm with a debugger that R passes RTLD_NOW to dlopen() when calling dyn.load(now =

...w=FALSE)` the first one, R seems to try to resolve the symbols immediately, causing the load to fail. For example, I have `libtorch` installed on my HPC. Note that it links to various libs such as `libcudart.so` and `libmkl_intel_lp64.so.2` which aren't currently in my library path: ? ~ ldd /stornext/System/data/nvidia/libtorch-gpu/libtorch-gpu-1.12.1/lib/libtorch_cpu.so linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffcab58c000) libgomp.so.1 => /stornext/System/data/apps/gcc/gcc-11.2.0/lib64/libgomp.so.1 (0x00007f8cb22bf000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f8cb2...

Morning All! Anyone ever tried exporting a StorNext CVFS filesystem from a Linux box??? I?ve got this Samba server (3.5.6) running on CentOS 5.4 and it?s working fine, exporting ext3, nfs and an IBM GPFS filesystem just fine. So I know Samba is good an my configuration is working. I tried to add the exportation of a StorNext CVFS volume and that...

...achines. I recently started getting an error that is confusing and I can't find info documented on it. I searched the news group and found it mentioned but no solution yet. I get the error when sync'ing from a Solaris 8 machine to my Solaris 8 server. stat space/sunpci/drives/F.drive/docs/StorNext/LinuxPort/devfs.README.txt : Value too large for defined data type stat space/sunpci/drives/F.drive/docs/StorNext/StorNextNotes.doc : Value too large for defined data type I also see the same error going from our IRIX 6.5.15 machine, and the error is seen on a directory vs a file: stat apps1/fsdev...

...ckup-site), with another SAN, same aplication etc. But this announce has come put a little delay. We do have several servers running CentOS (about 10 or so), on intel server platform. Now with this said, I am searching for documentation on operating a SAN under linux. We are looking at Quantum StorNext FS2 product for the SAN itselft. And I am searching info about accessing volumes on a fiber channel network by label. I know I can label individual ext3 partition, but how to do so on a raid array via fiber channel ? Basicly, I search for a linux starter guide to fiber channel storage. Thanks...

Hi, we are running samba 4.4 on two machines as file servers. Both are running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares using 2x1GB and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). Usin...

Hi All, I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the setup i had in mind is as following: All the data is already stored on a StorNext SAN filesystem (quantum ) this should be mounted on a centos server trough fiber optics , which in its turn shares the FS over NFS to all the rendernodes (also centos). Now we've estimated that the average file send to each node will be about 90MB , so that's what i like the average co...

...tructures with many thousands (up to 100k or more) of relatively small files (around 10MB each) and whatever I try, it goes pretty damn slow. I'm getting about 1 file every second, which comes down to somewhere between 50 and 100Mbit (and we've got a gigabit network). The files are on a StorNext filesystem that usually has no problem delivering 300MB/sec or more, so that shouldn't be a problem. Netperf also has no problems filling the lines, so that works as well. Anybody have any suggestions on getting things faster, or at least to check what's going wrong? Kind regards, Je...

...configuring with 7+ TB of storage is one of the smaller storage servers for our systems. Using the same configuration with more drives we are planning several 20TB+ systems. For the work we do a single file system over 100TB is not unreasonable. We will be replacing a 80TB SAN system based on StorNext with a Isilon system with 10G network connections. If there was a way to create a Linux (Centos) 100TB ? 500TB or larger clustered file system with the nodes connected via infiniband that was easily manageable with throughput that can support multiple 10Gbps Ethernet connections I would be ve...

...u as well: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2017-October/123611.html Hope this helps & best regards Andreas Am 02.11.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba: > Hi, > > we are running samba 4.4 on two machines as file servers. > Both are running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. > You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares > using 2x1GB > and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 > I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. > Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB...

...e/samba-technical/2017-October/123611.html > > Hope this helps & best regards > Andreas > > Am 02.11.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba: > >Hi, > > > >we are running samba 4.4 on two machines as file servers. > >Both are running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. > >You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares > >using 2x1GB > >and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With > >samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. > >Using a 100MB/s link for the cli...

I tried this on the IRC channel and got not response... I have a 2.2TB filesystem. The filesystem itself is a stornext (Quantum) filesystem, which in the /etc/fstab is type cvfs. When a client mounts the samba share, it only reports ~4GB (3.9 or 3.7 GB) total space. We have a third party app, which will/can not be updated which checks the disk space available and fails if it's not enough. Consequently, the t...

Greetings. Is there an approved way to aggregate LUNs when using OCFS2? I have several 1TB LUNs I'd like to make into a single filesystem. Would I use something like Linux software raid? Brett

Hi all, I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that? Any recommendations? Thanks in advance for any and all advice. Boris.

...2 public_addresses: 10.98.81.2/24 bond0 Ctdb: CTDB_RECOVERY_LOCK=/mnt/media23/.ctdb_lock/lock.file CTDB_DEBUGLEVEL=ERR CTDB_MANAGES_SAMBA=yes CTDB_PUBLIC_INTERFACE=bond0 CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses CTDB_SET_NoIpFailback=1 CTDB_SET_DeterministicIPs=0 The lock Filesystem is a Stornext Filesystem Any help would be apreciated. Cheers Axel -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/ctdb-split-brain-nodes-doesn-t-see-each-other-tp4668664.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down... http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing comment: "If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually become ubiquitously implemented