search for: storiq

...M, same RAID controller, same OS, etc) when an smbd process is writing at 500/600 MB/s the smbd CPU consumption maxes out at 47%! I don't know what's wrong and why smbd is burning CPU cycles like this. Here is a quick comparison I've done. Here is the "bad" machine: root at storiq-111:~# pidstat -p 11694 2 20 Linux 4.4.78-storiq64-opteron (storiq-111) 10/08/2017 _x86_64_ (32 CPU) 16:30:12 UID PID %usr %system %guest %CPU CPU Command 16:30:14 0 11694 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8 smbd 16:30:16 10500 11694 48,00...

...hen an smbd process is writing at 500/600 MB/s the smbd > CPU consumption maxes out at 47%! > > I don't know what's wrong and why smbd is burning CPU cycles like > this. > > Here is a quick comparison I've done. Here is the "bad" machine: > > root at storiq-111:~# pidstat -p 11694 2 20 > Linux 4.4.78-storiq64-opteron (storiq-111) 10/08/2017 > _x86_64_ (32 CPU) > > 16:30:12 UID PID %usr %system %guest %CPU CPU > Command 16:30:14 0 11694 0,00 0,00 0,00 > 0,00 8 smbd 16:30:16 105...

...k of i would check. > Its a pain, special when its far, the samba options are thing you > might be able to remotely check. Maybe it helps a bit. > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > > I would suggest that the OP tries this smb.conf: [global] netbios name = storiq-111 server string = %h server (Samba, Debian) security = ADS workgroup = TEST realm = AD.TEST.COM winbind refresh tickets = yes winbind use default domain = yes winbind cache time = 7200 winbind offline logon = yes idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config...

Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >