Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "storetype".
2010 Aug 02
7
Complex associations
I am working on a project that has some complex table associations,
and I am having a hard time declaring this association in a Model, and
fear it can''t be done.
Here is an example of my issue...
class StoreType < ActiveRecord::Base; end
class Store < ActiveRecord::Base; end
class Department < ActiveRecord::Base; end
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base; end
A StoreType has many stores and a Store has many Department. However,
both Store and Department have many products. An product has the
co...
2019 Dec 28
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
...?
>> features.cloudsync ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
>> features.utime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
>> ctime.noatime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
>> feature.cloudsync-storetype ? ? ? ? ? ? (null) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 05:51, Strahil <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcu...
2019 Dec 27
0
GFS performance under heavy traffic
...? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> features.cloudsync ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> features.utime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> ctime.noatime ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> feature.cloudsync-storetype ? ? ? ? ? ? (null) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 05:51, Strahil <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:...
2019 Dec 24
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
Hi David,
On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In testing we found that actually the GFS client having access to all 3 nodes made no difference to performance. Perhaps that's because the 3rd node that wasn't accessible from the client before was the arbiter node?
It makes sense, as no data is being generated towards