Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "storagepoolid".
Did you mean:
storagepool
2018 Feb 18
0
[PATCH 1/3] v2v: tests: check generated OVF
...nt>00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000</rasd:Parent>
+ <rasd:Template>00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000</rasd:Template>
+ <rasd:ApplicationList/>
+ <rasd:StorageId>12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc</rasd:StorageId>
+ <rasd:StoragePoolId>00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000</rasd:StoragePoolId>
+ <rasd:CreationDate>#DATE#</rasd:CreationDate>
+ <rasd:LastModified>#DATE#</rasd:LastModified>
+ <rasd:last_modified_date>#DATE#</rasd:last_modified_date>
+ <BootOr...
2018 Feb 18
6
[PATCH 0/3] Make generated OVF more conforming to standard
The main reason for creating different OVF is that it can be used to create VM
by oVirt REST API. The RHV export domain flavor cannot be used that way.
Tomáš Golembiovský (3):
v2v: tests: check generated OVF
v2v: ovf: Create OVF more aligned with the standard
v2v: vdsm: add --vdsm-fixed-ovf option
v2v/cmdline.ml | 5 ++
v2v/create_ovf.ml
2018 Feb 22
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] Make generated OVF more conforming to standard
The main reason for creating different OVF is that it can be used to create VM
by oVirt REST API. The RHV export domain flavor cannot be used that way.
v1 -> v2:
- introduced flavour types instead of booleans
- instead of referring to the new flavour as "standard OVF" or "fixed OVF" I
refer to it as oVirt flavour. While it is more conforming than the one used
in export
2010 Mar 30
3
[PATCH 1/2] Refactor guest and volume creation into Sys::VirtV2V::Target::LibVirt
Move all target-specific functionality into its own module in preparation for
output to RHEV.
---
MANIFEST | 1 +
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Connection.pm | 46 ++---
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Converter.pm | 138 +------------
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Target/LibVirt.pm | 419 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Transfer/ESX.pm | 91 +++------
po/POTFILES.in