search for: storage3

I have three machines, all Ubuntu 12.04 running gluster 3.3.1. storage1 192.168.6.70 on 10G, 192.168.5.70 on 1G storage2 192.168.6.71 on 10G, 192.168.5.71 on 1G storage3 192.168.6.72 on 10G, 192.168.5.72 on 1G Each machine has two NICs, but on each host, /etc/hosts lists the 10G interface on all machines. storage1 and storage3 were taken away for hardware changes, which included swapping the boot disks. They had the O/S reinstalled. Somehow I have gotten into a...

...ode] ^ | GlusterFS | v [Storage1 <-replicate-> Storage2] *********** Config2 (3-layer): *********** [Client-Node] ^ | GlusterFS | v [Re-Exporter/Proxy-Node] ^ | GlusterFS | v [Storage1 <-replicate-> Storage2, Storage3] *********** The "Config2" is the targeted structure. I do require the exporter layer as a proxy to keep the vol-files on the clients substituable and simple and by this - most important ;) - to reduce my administrative effort. Imagine the following: * Having 3 webserver-client-nodes, o...

...annot access /gluster/scratch: Transport endpoint is not connected $ ls /gluster/scratch3 dbbuild DBS $ sudo umount /gluster/scratch $ sudo mount /gluster/scratch $ ls /gluster/scratch dbbuild $ Note that /gluster/scratch is a distributed volume (spread across servers 'storage2' and 'storage3'), whereas /gluster/scratch3 is a single brick (server 'storage3' only). So *some* of the mounts do seem to automatically reconnect - not all are affected. But in future, I think it would be good if the FUSE client could automatically attempt to reconnect under whatever circumstance c...

...each host pools on different logical volumes, like: host1 -> lv1 host2 -> lv2 host3 -> lv3 and store pools/volumes on specified storage daemon that uses a specified device for each different hosts. host1 -> storage1 -> device_lv1 host2 -> storage2 -> device_lv2 host3 -> storage3 -> device_lv3 Unfortunately, I can't define on bacula-sd.conf multiple storage definition but only multiple devices. To use different storage I must run 3 bacula-sd on same host (I can?), run a bacula-sd on a vm/host. Ah, I must use only one physical server. With one single machine an...

...9;/> | </source> | <target dev='vdd' bus='virtio' /> | </disk> | <disk type='network' device='disk'> | <driver name='qemu'/> | <source protocol='rbd' name='libvirt-pool/arch_test2-storage3'> | <host name='192.168.0.35' port='6789'/> | <host name='192.168.0.2' port='6789'/> | <host name='192.168.0.40' port='6789'/> | </source> | <target dev='vde' bus='virti...

...: > > host1 -> lv1 > host2 -> lv2 > host3 -> lv3 > > and store pools/volumes on specified storage daemon that uses a > specified device for each different hosts. > > host1 -> storage1 -> device_lv1 > host2 -> storage2 -> device_lv2 > host3 -> storage3 -> device_lv3 > > > Unfortunately, I can't define on bacula-sd.conf multiple storage > definition but only multiple devices. To use different storage I must > run 3 bacula-sd on same host (I can?), run a bacula-sd on a vm/host. > Ah, I must use only one physical server. &g...

...gt; > host1 -> lv1 > host2 -> lv2 > host3 -> lv3 > > and store pools/volumes on specified storage daemon that uses a > specified device for each different hosts. > > host1 -> storage1 -> device_lv1 > host2 -> storage2 -> device_lv2 > host3 -> storage3 -> device_lv3 > > > Unfortunately, I can't define on bacula-sd.conf multiple storage > definition but only multiple devices. To use different storage I must > run 3 bacula-sd on same host (I can?), run a bacula-sd on a vm/host. > Ah, I must use only one physical server....

...host2 -> lv2 >> host3 -> lv3 >> >> and store pools/volumes on specified storage daemon that uses a >> specified device for each different hosts. >> >> host1 -> storage1 -> device_lv1 >> host2 -> storage2 -> device_lv2 >> host3 -> storage3 -> device_lv3 >> >> >> Unfortunately, I can't define on bacula-sd.conf multiple storage >> definition but only multiple devices. To use different storage I must >> run 3 bacula-sd on same host (I can?), run a bacula-sd on a vm/host. >> Ah, I must use only...

...eable = yes browseable = No create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 [backup1] comment = Private Backup 1 path = /share read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mode = 0777 force create mode = 0777 valid users = denes invalid users = bikeclub oplocks = false level2 oplocks = false [storage3] comment = Public Storage 3 path = /share5 read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mode = 0777 force create mode = 077 invalid users = bikeclub oplocks = false level2 oplocks = false [storage2] comment = Public Storage 2 path = /share2 read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 fo...

...eable = yes browseable = No create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 [backup1] comment = Private Backup 1 path = /share read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mode = 0777 force create mode = 0777 valid users = denes invalid users = bikeclub oplocks = false level2 oplocks = false [storage3] comment = Public Storage 3 path = /share5 read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mode = 0777 force create mode = 077 invalid users = bikeclub oplocks = false level2 oplocks = false [storage2] comment = Public Storage 2 path = /share2 read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 fo...

Hi! I just gave GlusterFS a try and experienced two problems. First some background: - I want to set up a file server with synchronous replication between branch offices, similar to Windows DFS-Replication. The goal is _not_ high-availability or cluster-scaleout, but just having all files locally available at each branch office. - To test GlusterFS, I installed two virtual machines