search for: stopwatch

...the testing so the results are more comparable. Is Bonnie+ a good program for hard drive speed testing? Is there a better option? I personally prefer hdparm but that is not an option for those who have SCSI. And what about the client to server copies? I personally just copy the file and use a stopwatch. I could write a program for Windows that would automate the process if one doesn't exist. So, lots of questions. Any help would be appreciated.

>Search took -125.376129 seconds I double checked with a handheld stopwatch, and at no point did the hands spin backwards. Known problem?

...with cptime.c32 on a Lexar Triton Jumpdrive (64GB, 170MB/s read in Windows, 150MB/s write in Windows) on bootable USB3.0 resulted in the following, depending on specified block size: * 2048 bytes --> 25MB/s * 2MB --> 61MB/s It would be nice to know at which speed MEMDISK is loading, but a stopwatch seems a bit crude as only method. Bernd

...of this is building the scimark2_1c benchmark... http://math.nist.gov/scimark2/download_c.html as follows on x86_64 Fedora 8... /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c FFT.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c kernel.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c Stopwatch.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c Random.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c SOR.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c SparseCompRow.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c array.c /home/howarth/llvm-gcc42-work/bin/gcc -O4 -m64 -c Mon...

...conf? Or is there any other way to ignore forced >shutdown? I'd like to see how long it would go until the batteries >actually drain. > Disconnect the computer from the UPS, connect a dummy load (like 2-3 * 100W tungsten light bulbs) , turn off the nut client on the computer. Start a stopwatch. Unplug the UPS from mains and wait for it to die. Read the value on the stopwatch. wolfy

I'm doing some performance tests on a samba NAS server and I've found some interesting statistics: I'm doing my performance tests in linux using: # time dd if=somelargefileovershare of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100 Then calculating the bandwidth For windows I'm low-tech: stopwatch plus drag-n-drop of a large file (any recommendations on a 'simple' windows program that will tell you how long it took to copy a file, or even calc the BW for you?) Here are my bandwidth results: nfs via linux: 10MB/s smb via linux: 5MB/s smb via win: 8MB/s Questions: - why would I be...

...-) Adding that feature is a few lines of code (orders of magnitude less than the system proposed by Dan) which are executed only at generation-time, i.e. when cmake has to regenerate the makefiles/project-files because a file was added/removed, etc. It adds nothing at build time and you will need a stopwatch to notice the difference at generation time. > I'm not really a stakeholder, but I agree with Chandler, it's worth > investigating simplifying LLVM's CMake files before making Yet Another build > system generator if you haven't already. That may not solve the problems &gt...

Dear All, We are currently working with very large datasets which even in R require a lot of calculation time. Is there an option of including a function/ tool or something alike which shows the remaining time of calculation? Just to see whether there is any progress or whether anything has crashed and to get a feeling whether we have to wait for 5 min or 30min... Any help is greatly

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Anyways, if you wish to avoid duplicating info on both Makefile and > CMakeLists.txt there is a simple solution: read and parse the Makefile > from the corresponding CMakeLists.txt. For instance, if you put the > library dependencies on the Makefile like this: > > LLVMLIBDEPS := foo zoo bar >

...any other way to ignore forced >> shutdown? I'd like to see how long it would go until the batteries >> actually drain. >> > Disconnect the computer from the UPS, connect a dummy load (like 2-3 * 100W tungsten light bulbs) , turn off the nut client on the computer. Start a stopwatch. Unplug the UPS from mains and wait for it to die. Read the value on the stopwatch. > > wolfy > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-u...

OK. I'll try it, but it really puzzles me how the battery could have gone bad for just 15 months. The online power is pretty stable, so the battery hasn't gone through many charge/discharge cycles... Regards, -- Georgi On 11.1.2020 at 14:24, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > > indicates that the UPS thought that battery was close to depleted and decided to shutdown. I suggest to fully

...res :-) Hmmm, I hadn't had any problem's w/ my FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE Samba, running on 100Mhz pentium, EZ2000 nic's thru xover cable to NT4SP3, also EZ2000 - copying a 7.4Mb .gz file from FreeBSD share to NT, using dos box 'copy' takes 30 seconds ( 15mb/min, 250Kb/sec) timed w/ stopwatch. Using smbclient to copy back to FreeBSD got 814Kb/sec (48 Mb/min) as reported by smbclient. --------------------------------- Why did the chicken cross the road? To show the o'possum it could be done. Chuck cswiger@widomaker.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment...

I''m running a site that gets ~30k to 40k page hits per day. In the last 4 days my mongrel processes have been jumping into high CPU usage a couple of times a day to the point where my site becomes unresponsive (database on a diff machine with no load). The only way for me to resolve the problem and reduce load on the machine is to delete my rails cache directory (I have plenty of space

Hi, I have run into the following I bonded 6 NICs on my Cent OS server into a 600MB pipe. I use bond method 4 = dynamic Link aggregation. My Cysco Switch supports this apparently. However I only get increased bandwidth from my MAC by connecting via AFP. However when I connect via SMB I don't. I was told to change the sockect options to the following on my smb.conf file on my fileserver:

...make it easier to optimise your functions. I've included an example below. I'd love to get your feedback on how easy you think this graphic is to read, and on ways that it could be improved. install.packages("butler") library(butler) # profile the glm example profile_glm <- stopwatch(function() example(glm)) # Plot the profile # y-axis gives percent of time spent in that function # x-axis gives position in call stack plot(profile_glm) # The first few levels aren't of interest, so we can skip them: # (see ?plot.call.tree for all options) plot(profile_glm, startlevel=4) #...

...on the DVD at the time of initial setup. One of our programs is currently in Beta Test which includes both command line and GUI operator inputs and responses.? The functional testing requires operator inputs or responses within certain time frames.? This timing has usually been implemented with a stopwatch that is operated by a test director. Other timing options would beneficial for complex testing scenarios One of our test directors suggested that we use a digital count- down timer with audio outputs to prompt test operators for their inputs or responses at appropriate times.? We have not found su...

Some what In-Reply-To: <1323092879.2629413.1445740496536.JavaMail.yahoo at mail.yahoo.com> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 02:34:56AM +0000, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: > Micheal Brown > > > > iPXE's HTTP implementation is definitely not slow. On a Gigabit LAN, > > you should get the full 1000Mbps speed for HTTP downloads: a 200MB test > > file should

I currently have a fairly simple Rails application running on FreeBSD under Apache 1.3 and normal CGI, and the performance I''m getting is alarmingly poor. I realize CGI or WebBrick are quite a bit slower than FastCGI, and I''ll probably use one of those instead when I have the time. However, I''m just curious if CGI is really supposed to be that slow, or if

hello On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Leo Currie wrote: > > Does anyone have experience doing remote live broadcasts over Icecast? My > > thought is to use a Dell laptop running Windows (yeah, I know ;-), > digitize > > locally to 16khz, and pump the output to a remote Linux box. > > > > Has anyone done something like this before? Thoughts? Issues? [...] > > Oh -

Hi all I hope no one minds but I was asked to post my timetrial findings back to the list. Hope it helps someone else as well, if you have any suggestions please mention them as I need all the speed that I can get The scenaro is as follows I have to switch mail servers and I need to copy all my mbox files over to the new machine. As you may well know time if off the utmost importance so I