search for: stockfish

Hi, an interesting new feature of wine 1.2 is it's 64-bit support. Many Windows chess engines gain about 50-80% speed increase when running at 64-bit. Most provide 32-bit and 64-bit engines. But on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 only an error message appears i.e. with the free Stockfish 1.8. Code: max at ub64:~/Downloads$ uname -a Linux ub64 2.6.32-24-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 5 09:20:59 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux max at ub64:~/Downloads$ wine --version wine-1.2 max at ub64:~/Downloads$ ll st* -rw-r--r-- 1 max max 357888 2010-07-02 12:22 stockfish-18-64-ja.exe -rw-r--r--...

...in upstream libtool today, we are unlikely to be able to really rely on that in the wild for perhaps 5 years. I don't think our users should have to wait that long for LLD to "Just Work" for them. We want LLD to have as little "fine print" as possible. It looks like "stockfish" and "TTSIOD" also failed to link as well. Stockfish seems to fail because by default when compiling with GCC the makefile uses -flto and LLD doesn't understand the GCC IR files. I think the COFF linker handles this by shelling out to the system linker in the case of MSVC LTO, an...

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > Note that even if/when we get changes incorporated into libtool it > will still take a long time for the change to appear in new releases > of software packages using libtool. A downstream patch to the libtool > package in various operating systems or distributions doesn't really > help that much

based on Aake's ideas, I wrote this script. It installs 32-bit and 64-bit wine on Ubuntu 10.10. Rybka 4.exe and the other 64-bit engines I've tested have all worked. automated compile of 64/32 bit wine for Ubuntu 10.10: http://www.jesseo.com/chess/64-bit-wine-ubuntu.sh perhaps someone could tell me how I turn this script into a deb file.

Michael Johnson <mpj at rowley.co.uk> writes: > Hi Rafael, >> Michael Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> >>> Hi Rui, >>> >>> Are there any plans to support the -defsym command line option? >> It doesn't look that hard, it was just never requested. What project is >> using it? > Not sure I understand