search for: stmtviz

...F/DWARFExpression.cpp 0.68 0.38 -43.3% lib/LTO/LTOModule.cpp 2.25 1.33 -41.1% lib/Target/TargetMachine.cpp 1.76 1.10 -37.8% Full list: Clang top 10 Filename Old New Delta tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 1.70 0.25 -85.2% lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 1.69 0.55 -67.3% lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.02 0.44 -57.4% tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1% unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6% lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9% unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0% unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3.43 2.52 -26....

...ule.cpp 2.25 1.33 -41.1% > lib/Target/TargetMachine.cpp 1.76 1.10 -37.8% > > Full list: > <llvm.txt> > > > *Clang top 10* > *Filename Old New Delta* > tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 1.70 0.25 -85.2% > lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 1.69 0.55 -67.3% > lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.02 0.44 -57.4% > tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1% > unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6% > lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9% > unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0% > unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3....

...25 1.33 -41.1% > lib/Target/TargetMachine.cpp 1.76 1.10 -37.8% > > Full list: > > <llvm.txt> > > > > *Clang top 10* > *Filename Old New Delta* > tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 1.70 0.25 -85.2% > lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 1.69 0.55 -67.3% > lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.02 0.44 -57.4% > tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1% > unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6% > lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9% > unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0% > unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 3....

...tools/llvm-dwp/llvm-dwp.cpp 2.48 1.53 -38.3% 92.5 55.2 -40.3% Full list: Clang top 10 Filename TimeOld TimeNew Delta SizeOld SizeNew SizeDelta tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 2.25 0.30 -86.9% 85.1 31.7 -62.7% lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 2.33 0.68 -70.6% 87.1 34.4 -60.5% lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.28 0.48 -62.5% 62.4 39.0 -37.5% tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 3.05 1.29 -57.8% 93.7 58.6 -37.4% unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 4.12 2.62 -36.5% 145.8 103.9 -28.7% lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 2.43 1.68 -30.7% 101.6 82.5 -18.8% unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 4.50 3.21...

...55.2 -40.3% > > Full list: > <llvm.txt> > > *Clang top 10* > *Filename TimeOld TimeNew Delta SizeOld SizeNew SizeDelta* > tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 2.25 0.30 -86.9% 85.1 31.7 -62.7% > lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 2.33 0.68 -70.6% 87.1 34.4 -60.5% > lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.28 0.48 -62.5% 62.4 39.0 -37.5% > tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 3.05 1.29 -57.8% 93.7 58.6 -37.4% > unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 4.12 2.62 -36.5% 145.8 103.9 -28.7% > lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 2.43 1.68 -30.7% 101.6 82.5 -18.8% > unittests/CodeGen/CodeGenExternalTest.cpp 4....

...1.76 1.10 -37.8% >> >> Full list: >> >> <llvm.txt> >> >> >> >> *Clang top 10* >> *Filename Old New Delta* >> tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 1.70 0.25 -85.2% >> lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 1.69 0.55 -67.3% >> lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.02 0.44 -57.4% >> tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1% >> unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6% >> lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9% >> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0% >> unittests/CodeGen/CodeGe...

...ne.cpp 1.76 1.10 -37.8% >> >> Full list: >> <llvm.txt> >> >> >> Clang top 10 >> Filename Old New Delta >> tools/libclang/CXString.cpp 1.70 0.25 -85.2% >> lib/Tooling/CommonOptionsParser.cpp 1.69 0.55 -67.3% >> lib/AST/StmtViz.cpp 1.02 0.44 -57.4% >> tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp 2.26 0.97 -57.1% >> unittests/CodeGen/BufferSourceTest.cpp 3.08 1.83 -40.6% >> lib/CodeGen/CGLoopInfo.cpp 1.91 1.34 -29.9% >> unittests/Tooling/RefactoringActionRulesTest.cpp 2.46 1.79 -27.0% >> unittests/Co...

- We do indeed have a lot of unnecessary includes around in llvm (or pretty much any other C++ project for that matter). - I want faster builds. - The only way to reliably fight this is indeed automatic tools. - Having the right amount of includes also has documentation value and ideally let's you understand the structure of your project. - However relying on transitive includes works contrary