Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph".
2013 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
On 08/16/2013 02:42 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> At 2013-08-16 12:44:02,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to reproduce your findings, but could not do so.
>
>
> Sorry, I did not put all code in my previous email because the code seems a little too long and complicated.
> You can refer to the detailed C code and LLVM IR
2013 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
...mRef_x_018_reg2mem[0] };
MustWriteAccess :=
[cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond2_preheader[i0] -> MemRef_x_018_reload_s2a[0] };
MustWriteAccess :=
[cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond2_preheader[i0] -> MemRef_x_1_lcssa_reg2mem[0] };
Stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph
Domain :=
[cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph[i0] : i0 >= 0 and i0 <= -1 + cond.reload and cond.reload >= 1 };
Scattering :=
[cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph[i0] -> scattering[0, i0, 1, 0, 0, 0,...
2013 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
At 2013-08-16 12:44:02,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I tried to reproduce your findings, but could not do so.
Sorry, I did not put all code in my previous email because the code seems a little too long and complicated.
You can refer to the detailed C code and LLVM IR code on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16843
There are four attachments