search for: stmt_for_cond5_preheader

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "stmt_for_cond5_preheader".

2013 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
On 08/16/2013 02:42 AM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-08-16 12:44:02,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to reproduce your findings, but could not do so. > > > Sorry, I did not put all code in my previous email because the code seems a little too long and complicated. > You can refer to the detailed C code and LLVM IR
2013 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
...mRef_x_018_reg2mem[0] }; MustWriteAccess := [cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond2_preheader[i0] -> MemRef_x_018_reload_s2a[0] }; MustWriteAccess := [cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond2_preheader[i0] -> MemRef_x_1_lcssa_reg2mem[0] }; Stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph Domain := [cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph[i0] : i0 >= 0 and i0 <= -1 + cond.reload and cond.reload >= 1 }; Scattering := [cond.reload] -> { Stmt_for_cond5_preheader_lr_ph[i0] -> scattering[0, i0, 1, 0,...
2013 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
At 2013-08-16 12:44:02,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >Hi, > >I tried to reproduce your findings, but could not do so. Sorry, I did not put all code in my previous email because the code seems a little too long and complicated. You can refer to the detailed C code and LLVM IR code on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16843 There are four attachments