search for: stl_list

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "stl_list".

2017 Apr 20
0
Default R-3.4.0 RC CXXFLAGS without -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu with g++-5.4.0 causes WARNING from stl_list.h
...ril/010733.html > where we have WARNINGS in R CMD check from "Found ?abort?,? > possibly from ?abort? (C)" in packages xcms/mzR. > The abort() call is not coming from XCMS, but rather? > from the C++ code in the STL: > > [...] > # 1770 "/usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_list.h" > void _M_check_equal_allocators(list& __x) { > ?if (_M_get_Node_allocator()) > ???__builtin_abort(); > } > > If we compile with -O2 optimisation, this getting rid of? > the abort() symbol, as shown? > in https://github.com/sneumann/xcms/issues/150#issuecomm...
2017 Apr 19
2
Default R-3.4.0 RC CXXFLAGS without -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu with g++-5.4.0 causes WARNING from stl_list.h
...thz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2017-April/010733.html where we have WARNINGS in R CMD check from "Found ?abort?,? possibly from ?abort? (C)" in packages xcms/mzR. The abort() call is not coming from XCMS, but rather? from the C++ code in the STL: [...] # 1770 "/usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_list.h" void _M_check_equal_allocators(list& __x) { ?if (_M_get_Node_allocator()) ???__builtin_abort(); } If we compile with -O2 optimisation, this getting rid of? the abort() symbol, as shown? in https://github.com/sneumann/xcms/issues/150#issuecomment-293545521 Martin Morgan created a m...