Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "stl_iterator_base_func".
Did you mean:
stl_iterator_base_funcs
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...str>::getNext (
N=0x5a5a5a5a) at MachineBasicBlock.h:37
#1 0x0854d807 in llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>::operator-- (
this=0xbfbfe880) at ilist:137
#2 0x085502c5 in std::__advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int>
(__i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=0) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:145
#3 0x08550311 in std::advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int> (
__i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=-1) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:177
#4 0x08550339 in llvm::prior<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr> > (it=
{<bidirectional_iterator<llvm::Machi...
2007 Sep 19
4
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:41:38PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> The "make check" produced:
> === Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 2209
> # of unexpected failures 41
> # of expected failures 5
> gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test'
> gmake: ***
2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...a) at MachineBasicBlock.h:37
> #1 0x0854d807 in
> llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>::operator-- (
> this=0xbfbfe880) at ilist:137
> #2 0x085502c5 in
> std::__advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int>
> (__i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=0) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:145
> #3 0x08550311 in
> std::advance<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr>, int> (
> __i=@0xbfbfe880, __n=-1) at stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:177
> #4 0x08550339 in
> llvm::prior<llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineInstr> > (it=
> {<bid...
2019 May 25
3
llvm pass
Hi list,
I have several questions about LLVM pass.
1) Is building a custom LLVM pass out-of-source not recommended?
The official document only contains instructions about in-source build (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html <http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html>).
2) opt (ver >= 4) with custom pass libraries does not work as before. When I have a simple custom LLVM pass
2018 Aug 01
2
LLJVM make error
That source file was removed from LLVM in r232397 on March 16, 2015.
It looks like lljvm hasn't been updated in a long time. LLVM's C++ APIs are not stable, so there is no expectation that a project built against LLVM's C++ API in 2015 would build or reasonably function against LLVM trunk.
The project probably works against LLVM 3.6.2 which was (I believe) the last LLVM release to
2006 Aug 14
2
[LLVMdev] Folding instructions
...nt, llvm::VirtRegMap::ModRef> > >,
std::less<llvm::MachineInstr*>,
std::allocator<std::pair<llvm::MachineInstr* const, std::pair<unsigned
int, llvm::VirtRegMap::ModRef> > > >::erase (this=0x8d1afcc,
__position={_M_node = 0x8d1c520}) at
/usr/include/c++/4.0.0/bits/stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:994
#2 0x0073df9c in std::_Rb_tree<llvm::MachineInstr*,
std::pair<llvm::MachineInstr* const, std::pair<unsigned int,
llvm::VirtRegMap::ModRef> >, std::_Select1st<std::pair<llvm::MachineInstr*
const, std::pair<unsigned int, llvm::VirtRegMap::ModRef> > >,
std::les...