Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "stitt".
Did you mean:
slitt
2003 Jun 19
0
Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PD C Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Stitt [mailto:grstitt@somanetworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after
> Samba PDC
> Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
>
>
> My apolgies in posting this again. However I was hoping so...
2003 Jun 04
3
Limiting Users
When using windows NT and Netware there are ways of limiting the logins of
users such as only allowing them on between 9am - 5pm and limiting maximum
concurrent connection to one. Is there a way of enforcing these
restrictions through samba or similar?
Many thanks
Gareth Norman
2003 Jun 03
1
Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PDC Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
...o be recreated. Which is
a very time-consuming effort.
Is there a better way to deal with this upgrade path?
Ideally where I don't have to visit each windows 2000 machine in order
to re-create their machine accounts? A migration utility or set of
server-side steps perhaps?
Regards,
Geoff Stitt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20030603/7daa3b43/attachment.bin
2002 Apr 24
4
Tag Proposal -> Tag Standard
Alright. So, the tag proposal that has been labored over for some
months has now been reclassified a bit. There new URL is now here:
http://reactor-core.org/ogg-tag-recommendations.html
And is prefaced by the following statement:
"The following recommendations were developed by a community of
Ogg/Vorbis users for their own use."
I believe the implication is that this document
2000 May 12
9
comment field proposal
Well, this is a bit stronger than a proposal; this is "what I plan to do unless
people see obvious flaws I missed"...
The text comment header is the second (of three) header packets that begin a Vorbis bitstream. It is meant for short, text comments, not arbitrary metadata; arbitrary metadata will be put in a metadata stream, likely an XML stream type. We've discussed this in