search for: stitt

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "stitt".

Did you mean: slitt
2003 Jun 19
0
Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PD C Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Geoff Stitt [mailto:grstitt@somanetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:34 AM > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: [Samba] Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after > Samba PDC > Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a) > > > My apolgies in posting this again. However I was hoping so...
2003 Jun 04
3
Limiting Users
When using windows NT and Netware there are ways of limiting the logins of users such as only allowing them on between 9am - 5pm and limiting maximum concurrent connection to one. Is there a way of enforcing these restrictions through samba or similar? Many thanks Gareth Norman
2003 Jun 03
1
Win2K Machine Accounts No Longer Valid after Samba PDC Upgrade (2.2.2 to 2.2.8a)
...o be recreated. Which is a very time-consuming effort. Is there a better way to deal with this upgrade path? Ideally where I don't have to visit each windows 2000 machine in order to re-create their machine accounts? A migration utility or set of server-side steps perhaps? Regards, Geoff Stitt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20030603/7daa3b43/attachment.bin
2002 Apr 24
4
Tag Proposal -> Tag Standard
Alright. So, the tag proposal that has been labored over for some months has now been reclassified a bit. There new URL is now here: http://reactor-core.org/ogg-tag-recommendations.html And is prefaced by the following statement: "The following recommendations were developed by a community of Ogg/Vorbis users for their own use." I believe the implication is that this document
2000 May 12
9
comment field proposal
Well, this is a bit stronger than a proposal; this is "what I plan to do unless people see obvious flaws I missed"... The text comment header is the second (of three) header packets that begin a Vorbis bitstream. It is meant for short, text comments, not arbitrary metadata; arbitrary metadata will be put in a metadata stream, likely an XML stream type. We've discussed this in