search for: stipanovic

On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 13:01, Stefan Stipanovic <stefomeister at gmail.com> wrote: > Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? It's not. More people were added as moderators to curb the problem instead. Are you having trouble joining the channel?

At 8/16/2020 10:39 AM, Stefan Stipanovic wrote: >Hi Paul, > >I've read "LLVM Code-Review Policies and Practices," but I remain unsure of a couple of things. Do I always wait for an actual "LGTM", or can people approve the patch for submission in other ways? > >The patch is accepted through Phabricato...

Hi all, A while back we started annotating intrinsics with new attributes ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D65377) After some discussion it was decided it would be good to have an `opt-out` attribute list for intrinsics. Some attributes that can be added to the list could be: nosync, nofree, nounwind, willreturn For now, there are 2 approaches: 1. Filtering opt-out attributes in tablegen source (

Hi everyone, Last year I found about GSoC and llvm bit to late to apply. I noticed that "Improve function attribute inference" project idea was not taken. Does anyone know if someone has worked on it in the meantime? If not, is someone interested in mentoring? Nuno Lopes or someone else? Thanks and regards, Stefan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? Thanks, Stefan On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:23 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:03, Ryan Houdek <sonicadvance1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll comment from the perspective of someone that is in the Mesa, > #dri-devel, #radeon

...on IRC channel, but without the need to fit the some schedule at all. Lastly, I'd like to hear your thoughts and suggestions where to start. I started watching Manuel Klimek's talk about clang ast. Any additional readings and/or advices would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance, Stefan Stipanovic -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180326/aaa6fb13/attachment.html>

I've read "LLVM Code-Review Policies and Practices," but I remain unsure of a couple of things. Do I always wait for an actual "LGTM", or can people approve the patch for submission in other ways? What happens when a patch is approved but then there are additional review comments? Should the patch be submitted as is, then a follow-up patch submitted, or should the

...ithub?)? I can try to work on AAReachability TODO after > solving this issue. > > Thanks and Regards > > > References > > [1] https://youtu.be/HVvvCSSLiTw > [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/179 > > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:12 PM Stefan Stipanovic <stefomeister at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Fahad, >> >> >>> > Improve dynamic memory related capabilities of Attributor. For example >>> Improve HeapToStackConversions. Maybe such deductions can help safety >>> (dis)provers. For example,...

Hi Fahad, > > Improve dynamic memory related capabilities of Attributor. For example > Improve HeapToStackConversions. Maybe such deductions can help safety > (dis)provers. For example, can we improve the use-after-free bug detection > using some attributes? > Stefan should know more about H2S. Regarding the use-after-free, I don't > think there's currently any plans