search for: stingray

Hi folks Im currently doin firewall project.. the scenario is like this.. my application server open port number 3079 the server ip is 202.188.0.132. and now the port can be accessed from everywhere. Now i want to block all the everywhere accessed. But my problem is, the application will be accessed by few locations that doing transaction with the application server. and the said locations are

Is it possible to filter HTTP signatures/headers with SHOREWALL ? or is there addon for it ? take care *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Stingray *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbre...

I want to build a robust firewall for a resort installation. The resort''s telephony is entirely VOIP, asterisk based. We have the following internet feeds: 1) 512/512 kb fixed bandwidth leased line with static IP from Telco- primary connection, expensive, to use for VOIP, VPN traffic, mail server, SSH access for remote work. Reliable. 2) 256/512 kb ADSL from Telco, not fixed IP -

...er it's wise to release the FTP-location I would recommend everyone to just look over their daemons, and run something like nessus against theirselves... Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:26:59 -0700 From: "Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray)" <mackys@MACKY.RONIN.NET> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: ADM Worm. Worm for Linux x86 found in wild. 1. Summary On the week of 3/7, a polite mail from a system administrator at a company in Russia tipped me off to one of our Redhat boxes portscanning one of their subnets. Subsequ...

...d starts connecting - but I cannot descend deeper into directories and cannot access any file. Here I already turned snoop off so I cannot provide exactly which path winXP adds to actual path. I can provide dump to team members, and will glad to provide any additional information. -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

Hi everybody, I have problem with samba and really don't know how to solve it. Seems as if samba ignored write list and read list options in smb.conf. Because when I have writeable = yes read list = dummy user dummy can still write/delete. When I try to do it opposite, i.e. read only = yes write list = dummy then dummy cannot write. The point is, I have bunch of users specified by valid

...and can be found at: http://adm.isp.at/ADM/ADMw0rm-v1.tar The public version solely exploits the name server iquery bug, although it is fairly easy to make it exploit ANY remote vulnerability. (Put in BSD/Sun exploits and it wouldn't be too linux specific anymore. :&) Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray) wrote: > How it picks the IP addresses to scan is not > presently known to me. Presumably, the "gimmieip" binary takes care > of that. Someone with more time can dissect it and post the results. True, it will start with a random IP number, then scan sequentially onwards, e.g....

Hello, I have a weird problem with valid/invalid users settings in smb.conf file. It started when I migrated to another machine and started to use pam_mysql. I used samba's internal smbpasswd before. The smb.conf stayed almost the same. But I just don't understand how could pam_mysql cause this. Without "valid users" in config, I can login with any account present in my DB

I''ve been poking around my system, and realized that having a tftp server would be handy. (I''m working with cisco routers, which have the capability to up and download configuration images via tftp.) However, I''m not content with the usual tftpd that comes with Linux. The whole "specify each directory you want" scheme is cock-eyed to me. I''d prefer