Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "stillvalid".
2017 Sep 22
2
gsDesign Pocock & OBF boundary
...nalysisRatio*? Z?? Nominal p? Spend????????1? 0.796 1.82??? 0.0346 0.0346????????2? 1.061 1.82??? 0.0346 0.0154????Total??????????????????????0.0500 ?++alpha spending:Pocockboundary.*Sample size ratio compared to fixed design with no interim?Can anyone share some light whether the above analysis is stillvalid? Or for unequal spacing, I have to use Lan-Demet?s error spendingfunction approximations??Thank you,
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2017 Sep 23
0
gsDesign Pocock & OBF boundary
...nalysisRatio* Z Nominal p Spend 1 0.796 1.82 0.0346 0.0346 2 1.061 1.82 0.0346 0.0154 Total 0.0500 ++alpha spending:Pocockboundary.*Sample size ratio compared to fixed design with no interim Can anyone share some light whether the above analysis is stillvalid? Or for unequal spacing, I have to use Lan-Demet?s error spendingfunction approximations? Thank you,
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
Your example code is a complete mess.
Do NOT post in html. This is a plain text mailing list.
Read the Posting Guide (https://www.r-project.org/post...
2017 Sep 24
2
gsDesign Pocock & OBF boundary
...AnalysisRatio*? Z? Nominal p? Spend? ? ? ? 1? 0.796 1.82? ? 0.0346 0.0346? ? ? ? 2? 1.061 1.82? ? 0.0346 0.0154? ? Total? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0.0500? ++alpha spending:Pocockboundary.*Sample size ratio compared to fixed design with no interim Can anyone share some light whether the above analysis is stillvalid? Or for unequal spacing, I have to use Lan-Demet?s error spendingfunction approximations? Thank you,
> ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
Your example code is a complete mess.
Do NOT post in html. This is a plain text mailing list.
Read the Posting Guide (https://www.r-project.org/p...
2017 Sep 24
0
gsDesign Pocock & OBF boundary
...ominal p? Spend? ? ? ?
>1? 0.796 1.82? ? 0.0346 0.0346? ? ? ? 2? 1.061 1.82? ? 0.0346 0.0154? ?
>Total? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0.0500? ++alpha
>spending:Pocockboundary.*Sample size ratio compared to fixed design
>with no interim Can anyone share some light whether the above analysis
>is stillvalid? Or for unequal spacing, I have to use Lan-Demet?s error
>spendingfunction approximations? Thank you,
>> ??? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>
>Your example code is a complete mess.
>Do NOT post in html. This is a plain text mailing list.
>Read the Posting Guide...