Displaying 20 results from an estimated 63 matches for "still_empty".
2011 Dec 07
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix refill related races
...nfo *vi)
}
}
+static void virtnet_refill_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool enable)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
+ vi->refill_enable = enable;
+ mutex_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
+}
+
static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi;
bool still_empty;
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
- napi_disable(&vi->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
- /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
- * we will *never* try to fill again. */
- if (still_e...
2011 Dec 07
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix refill related races
...nfo *vi)
}
}
+static void virtnet_refill_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool enable)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
+ vi->refill_enable = enable;
+ mutex_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
+}
+
static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi;
bool still_empty;
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
- napi_disable(&vi->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
- /* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
- * we will *never* try to fill again. */
- if (still_e...
2011 Dec 20
0
[PATCH] virtio_net: fix refill related races
...ork refill;
+
+ /* Whether napi is enabled, protected by a refill_lock. */
+ bool napi_enable;
+
+ /* Lock to protect refill and napi enable/disable operations. */
+ struct mutex refill_lock;
};
struct skb_vnet_hdr {
@@ -494,14 +501,20 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
bool still_empty;
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
- napi_disable(&vi->napi);
+
+ mutex_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
+ if (vi->napi_enable)
+ napi_disable(&vi->napi);
still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
+ if (vi->napi_enable...
2011 Dec 20
0
[PATCH] virtio_net: fix refill related races
...ork refill;
+
+ /* Whether napi is enabled, protected by a refill_lock. */
+ bool napi_enable;
+
+ /* Lock to protect refill and napi enable/disable operations. */
+ struct mutex refill_lock;
};
struct skb_vnet_hdr {
@@ -494,14 +501,20 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
bool still_empty;
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
- napi_disable(&vi->napi);
+
+ mutex_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
+ if (vi->napi_enable)
+ napi_disable(&vi->napi);
still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
+ if (vi->napi_enable...
2010 Jun 03
0
[PATCH 1/3][STABLE] KVM: fix delayed refill checking
...ad30b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -395,8 +395,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
napi_disable(&vi->napi);
- try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- still_empty = (vi->num == 0);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
napi_enable(&vi->napi);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
2010 Jun 03
0
[PATCH 1/3][STABLE] KVM: fix delayed refill checking
...ad30b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -395,8 +395,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
napi_disable(&vi->napi);
- try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- still_empty = (vi->num == 0);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
napi_enable(&vi->napi);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH v3 19/41] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH v3 19/41] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v5 22/45] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v6 23/46] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 23/46] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v8 23/50] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v5 22/45] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v6 23/46] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 23/46] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v8 23/50] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2011 Feb 10
2
[PATCH] virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
...(vi->rvq);
+ __napi_schedule(&vi->napi);
+ }
+}
+
static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi;
@@ -454,7 +468,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_stru
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
napi_disable(&vi->napi);
still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- napi_enable(&vi->napi);
+ virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
* we will *never* try to fill again. */
@@ -638,16 +652,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_devic
{
struct virtnet_info *vi =...
2011 Feb 10
2
[PATCH] virtio_net: Add schedule check to napi_enable call
...(vi->rvq);
+ __napi_schedule(&vi->napi);
+ }
+}
+
static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi;
@@ -454,7 +468,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_stru
vi = container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, refill.work);
napi_disable(&vi->napi);
still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL);
- napi_enable(&vi->napi);
+ virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
* we will *never* try to fill again. */
@@ -638,16 +652,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_devic
{
struct virtnet_info *vi =...
2014 Nov 25
1
[PATCH v4 20/42] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...
2014 Nov 25
1
[PATCH v4 20/42] virtio_net: pass vi around
...big(rq, gfp);
else
- err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
+ err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
oom = err == -ENOMEM;
if (err)
@@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
napi_disable(&rq->napi);
- still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
+ still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
@@ -745,12 +747,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
while (received < b...