search for: stevenb

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "stevenb".

Did you mean: steven
2006 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > You wrote: > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > > &gt...
2006 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > You wrote: > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > > >> all, > >...
2006 Sep 09
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > You wrote: > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > >> all, > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
2006 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
...ad of gfortran. I haven't used it for a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1. On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > > You wrote: > > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfort...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...ew lines, and then we get junk. What gives? (2nd quick question) I guarantee I will not bother you again once I get the quick answers :) TIA Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: <stevenb@frii.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from deimos.frii.net (deimos.frii.com [216.17.128.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9804F54 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Befamet.frii.com (befamet.frii.com [216.1...
2004 Aug 29
1
[LLVMdev] Is anyone working on an AMD64 port?
Hi, Is anyone working on an AMD64 backend for LLVM? I'd like to see it have one and if nobody's working on it yet, I might try to get a few people together to work on it a bit. Gr. Steven
2006 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
You wrote: > The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > all, Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults Gr. Steven