Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "stevenb".
Did you mean:
steven
2006 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > > You wrote:
> > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> > >...
2006 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > You wrote:
> > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> > >> all,
> >...
2006 Sep 09
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > You wrote:
> >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> >> all,
> > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
>
> Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?
2006 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
...ad of gfortran. I haven't used it for
a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1.
On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > > > You wrote:
> > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfort...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...ew lines, and then we get junk. What gives? (2nd
quick question)
I guarantee I will not bother you again once I get the quick answers :)
TIA
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <stevenb@frii.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from deimos.frii.net (deimos.frii.com [216.17.128.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9804F54 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Befamet.frii.com (befamet.frii.com [216.1...
2004 Aug 29
1
[LLVMdev] Is anyone working on an AMD64 port?
Hi,
Is anyone working on an AMD64 backend for LLVM? I'd like to see
it have one and if nobody's working on it yet, I might try to get
a few people together to work on it a bit.
Gr.
Steven
2006 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
You wrote:
> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
> all,
Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults
Gr.
Steven