search for: stevecowles

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

I would like to place an exchange 5.5 server in my DMZ. Can anyone tell me how I can set this up to allow LAN clients to be able to connect to Exchange and also so I can admin the box from the LAN with Terminal Services? Thank you.

Hi, I have a network with 4 NIC, one external, DMZ, and two internal, B & C. It has been setup correctlly and working now. The problem I have now, is any client workstation running on network B, MSWindows 2K / XP / NT cannot connect to the primary domain controller which is in network C. The clients cannot even see the network domain in the explorere window. I believe the problem is

How would i allow xwindows and xdmcp through would it be ACCEPT net -> fw all 117 and ACCEPT net -> fw all 6000:6100 ? and for that matter how would i stop x traffic from leaving the fw machine? REJECT fw -> net all 6000:6100 ?

...could not find the response from Tom about different tcp stacks. Thanks, -- Steve Herber herber@thing.com work: 206-261-0307 Systems Engineer, AMCIS, UoW home: 425-454-2399 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 22:13:54 -0500 From: "Cowles, Steve" <Steve@SteveCowles.com> To: shorewall-users@shorewall.net Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] SMTP outbound problem > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Van Eeckhoutte > Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 9:13 PM > To: shorewall-users@shorewall.net > Subject: [Shorewall-users] SMTP outbound problem >...

Ok, I hate to be the newbie posting a dumb question, but I can''t get port forwarding to work... in interfaces I have: net eth0 detect dhcp loc eth1 192.168.1.255 routestopped in rules I have: # # Forward FTP connections to 2021 to 192.168.1.3 # ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 2021 21 So, the end result should be that

Hi all! I posted earlier about the proxy arp configuration = http://shorewall.sourceforge.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm#NonRouted, = and was probably not sufficiently knowledgeable on the subject. I''ve = gone through a bunch of documents on proxy arp, subnetting with proxy = arp and the documentation at shorewall, and have come up with a setup = that would be perfect for the job at hand

..." Let me tell you, I know how bad an Exchange server gets when it is accessable from the Inet.. We have been working 20hr days for a week straight to clean up that mess.. I would suggest you re-think that approach. -Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cowles, Steve" <Steve@SteveCowles.com> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:28 AM Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Exchange Server in DMZ > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Randy Millis > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:15 PM > > Subject: [Shorewa...

Although the parameterized samples have allowed people to get a firewall up and running quickly, they have unfortunately set the wrong level of expectation among those who have used them. I am therefore withdrawing support for the samples and I am recommending that they not be used in new Shorewall installations. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:05 AM > To: Steve Herber > Cc: Shorewall Development > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-devel] RE: [Shorewall-users] SMTP outbound > problem (fwd) > > > On Mon, 13 May 2002, Steve Herber wrote: > > > I think we should add an FAQ entry for tcp_ecn. > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 1:15 PM > To: Shorewall Development > Subject: [Shorewall-devel] [Shorewall-users] Redirect loc::80 to > fw::3128 not work (fwd) > > > I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules > file to designate redirection/forwarding is

defiantly??? Uh!!! That should be: I would definitely use this feature... Damn spell checker suggestions that I failed to notice. <grin> Steve Cowles > Tom, > > I would defiantly use this feature if you decide to implement > within Shorewall. It would be nice to block those annoying > banner adds at the firewall instead of using (in my case) > Internet

raymond breen wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Just recently installed shorewall and had it up and running in no time > with the basic config. I have installed and configured sendmail and > would like to use it as a relay to our internal exchange server. I > have setup the relay domains and domain routing so sendmail should be > sorted out. Based on my interpretation of the above