search for: stevebrond

...nd unloading across learner types we can still hit the MAX_NUM_DLLS error, meaning we'll have to break them down further (or maybe we can be clever with gcDLLs()?). I'm CC'ing Lars Kotthoff and Bernd Bischl to make sure I am representing the issue well. Regards, Steve Bronder Website: stevebronder.com Phone: 412-719-1282 Email: sbronder at stevebronder.com On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Henrik Bengtsson < henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > On reason for hitting the MAX_NUM_DLLS (= 100) limit is because some > packages don't unload their DLLs when they being unload...

...fective unit tests. If MAX_NUM_DLLS is set to 100 for a very particular reason than I apologize, but if it is possible to increase MAX_NUM_DLLS it would at least make the testing at mlr much easier. I understand you are all very busy and thank you for your time. Regards, Steve Bronder Website: stevebronder.com Phone: 412-719-1282 Email: sbronder at stevebronder.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 20 December 2016 at 17:40, Martin Maechler wrote: | >>>>> Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> | >>>>> on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:34:31 -0500 writes: | | > Thanks Henrik this is very helpful! I will try this out on our tests and | > see if gcDLLs() has a positive effect. | | > mlr currently has tests broken down by learner type such as classifi...

>>>>> Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> >>>>> on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:34:31 -0500 writes: > Thanks Henrik this is very helpful! I will try this out on our tests and > see if gcDLLs() has a positive effect. > mlr currently has tests broken down by learner type such as classification,...

Hi, Dirk: On 12/20/2016 10:56 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 20 December 2016 at 17:40, Martin Maechler wrote: > | >>>>> Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> > | >>>>> on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:34:31 -0500 writes: > | > | > Thanks Henrik this is very helpful! I will try this out on our tests and > | > see if gcDLLs() has a positive effect. > | > | > mlr currently has tests broken down by l...

Looks like the c(x)[...] bit used to be as.matrix(x)[...]. Not sure why the change was made many years ago, but this was before names were handled explicitly. It would definitely be better to not force the duplicate, at least in the case where we are sure c() and [ would not dispatch. Best, luke On Mon, 4 May 2015, peter dalgaard wrote: > >> On 04 May 2015, at 19:59 , franknarf

.../cran.rstudio.com/") Error in install.packages : type 'binary' is not supported on this platform --- Platform session info below: sessionInfo() R version 3.2.3 (2015-12-10) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS Regards, Steve Bronder Website: stevebronder.com Phone: 412-719-1282 Email: sbronder at stevebronder.com On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:33 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 27 Feb 2016, at 05:22 , Ramnath Vaidyanathan < > ramnath.vaidya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Installing package...

...on of variance describes the amount of variance with respect to the number of components the user chooses to show? So if I only choose one I will explain 100% of the variance? I think showing 'Total Proportion of Variance' is important if that is the case. Regards, Steve Bronder Website: stevebronder.com Phone: 412-719-1282 Email: sbronder at stevebronder.com On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen < kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> wrote: > Martin, I fully agree. This becomes an issue when you have big matrices. > > (Note that there are awesome methods for ac...

..._, small-ish variance and are interpreted as noise. Of course the magnitude of the noise is important information. > But then you should use Factor Analysis which has that concept of ?noise? (unlike PCA). Cheers, Jari Oksanen >> On 25 Mar 2016, at 00:02 , Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> wrote: >> >> I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only >> n PCs reduce the load on memory? >> >> The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of >> Variance as you describe it may be...

...if R CMD check would also check that DLLs are unregistered when a package is unloaded (https://github.com/HenrikBengtsson/Wishlist-for-R/issues/29), but of course, someone needs to write the code / a patch for this to happen. /Henrik On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> wrote: > This is a request to increase MAX_NUM_DLLS in Rdynload.c in from 100 to 500. > > On line 131 of Rdynload.c, changing > > #define MAX_NUM_DLLS 100 > > to > > #define MAX_NUM_DLLS 500 > > > In development of the mlr package, there have been seve...

...that is (usually) not the intention at all. The common case is that the remainder terms have a roughly _constant_, small-ish variance and are interpreted as noise. Of course the magnitude of the noise is important information. -pd > On 25 Mar 2016, at 00:02 , Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> wrote: > > I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only > n PCs reduce the load on memory? > > The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of > Variance as you describe it may be confusing to new users....

>>>>> Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> >>>>> on Thu, 7 May 2015 11:49:49 -0400 writes: > Is it possible to replace c() with .subset()? It would be possible, but I think "entirely" wrong. .subset() is documented to be an internal function not to be used "lightly" and more to the...

...are "uninformative", so that you can make do with only the first handful regressors. I tend to interpret "uninformative" as "noise-like" in these contexts. -pd > > Cheers, Jari Oksanen > >>> On 25 Mar 2016, at 00:02 , Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> wrote: >>> >>> I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only >>> n PCs reduce the load on memory? >>> >>> The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of >>> Variance as...

Following from the R-help thread of March 22 on "Memory usage in prcomp", I've started looking into adding an optional 'rank.' argument to prcomp allowing to more efficiently get only a few PCs instead of the full p PCs, say when p = 1000 and you know you only want 5 PCs. (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-March/437228.html As it was mentioned, we already

...} else n <- length(x) if (!missing(nrow)) n <- nrow if (missing(ncol)) ncol <- n } nc <- 10 set.seed(1) m <- matrix(sample(letters,nc^2,replace=TRUE), ncol = nc) runoff <- microbenchmark( diaga = diag(m), diagb = diag2(m) ) Regards, Steve Bronder Website: stevebronder.com Phone: 412-719-1282 Email: sbronder at stevebronder.com On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:46 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > Looks like the c(x)[...] bit used to be as.matrix(x)[...]. Not sure > why the change was made many years ago, but this was before names were > handled...

Installing packages from binaries on Windows seems broken, when using mirrors that are up to date with CRAN install.packages( 'httr', type = 'binary', repos = "https://cran.rstudio.com/" ) Changing repos to the Kansas CRAN mirror installs the package as expected, but that could be because the KS mirror has not yet synced. Someone pointed out that the PACKAGES.gz

...l((nm <- nms[[1L]][seq_len(m)]), nms[[2L]][seq_len(m)])) > names(y) <- nm > > ? > > /Henrik > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Martin Maechler > <maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>>> Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> >>>>>>> on Thu, 7 May 2015 11:49:49 -0400 writes: >> >> > Is it possible to replace c() with .subset()? >> >> It would be possible, but I think "entirely" wrong. >> >> .subset() is documented to be an internal f...

Hello, Has a decision been made yet as to whether R 4.0.0 on Windows is going to be built using the new gcc8 toolchain (described at https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/testing/rtools40.html)? >From the sidelines, I can see that the toolchain is being used to build and test packages on CRAN; if there are any remaining issues that I can help to try and run down (either in R or any CRAN

...s.null)) && identical((nm <- nms[[1L]][seq_len(m)]), nms[[2L]][seq_len(m)])) names(y) <- nm ? /Henrik On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Steve Bronder <sbronder at stevebronder.com> >>>>>> on Thu, 7 May 2015 11:49:49 -0400 writes: > > > Is it possible to replace c() with .subset()? > > It would be possible, but I think "entirely" wrong. > > .subset() is documented to be an internal function not to be > used...