search for: stephenckyl

...e AssertingHandle on Values. It's part of my plan to make the MCJIT independent from Module stuff to allow reoptimizations, or to have multiple copies of JITed functions for one function in the module, but there is a long road to go. Olivier. On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Kyle <stephenckyle at googlemail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I found the following wiki page in the Unladen Swallow project: > > http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/CodeLifecycle > > This would appear to answer my question. Could someone confirm for me > if it's definitely unsafe t...

...d using llvm::CloneModule() to copy the Module and then work on that instead to JIT a new function, but it seems that doesn't always work, or even the cloning process itself causes an assertion to be raised. Thanks in advance for any replies, Stephen On 8 November 2010 21:22, Stephen Kyle <stephenckyle at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had any success with running different PassManagers on > llvm::Modules they've already JITed and are executing? > > In detail: > > 1) getting the IR, in form of an llvm::Module > 2) calling PassManager->run() on th...

Hi, Has anyone had any success with running different PassManagers on llvm::Modules they've already JITed and are executing? In detail: 1) getting the IR, in form of an llvm::Module 2) calling PassManager->run() on the module 3) calling getFunction() and getPointerToFunction() to JIT the module 4) executing the JITed code using the function pointer received in step 3 and then what I