search for: stepfft

....159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' **************************** The second one too. /llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp -r 0.016" simple sse.stepfft ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.stepfft' FAILED! ******************** Execution Context Diff: /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-...

...el.diff = 1.738626e-02 > Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' > **************************** > > The second one too. > > /llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp -r 0.016" simple > sse.stepfft > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.stepfft' FAILED! > ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: > 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 > abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 > Ou...

...8626e-02 >> Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 >> ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' **************************** >> >> The second one too. >> >> /llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp -r 0.016" simple sse.stepfft >> ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.stepfft' FAILED! ******************** >> Execution Context Diff: >> /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 >> abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 &gt...

...-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft TEST-RESULT-exec-time: user 0.3200 TEST-RESULT-exec-real-time: real 0.3172 TEST-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft TEST-RESULT-exec-time: user 0.4000 TEST-RESULT-exec-real-time: real 0.4172 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE' TEST-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpac...

Hi, I compiled llvm v3.0 on linux x86_64 with gcc 4.4.6 and test-suite fails on two tests: SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft I configured and compiled with with ../llvm/configure CFLAGS=-O3 --prefix=/scratch/user/local/llvm-release_30_opt --enable-optimized make -j2 make check-all and tested with gmake TEST=simple report report.html I got two failures, which flags should I use to compile with optimiz...

...rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft > TEST-RESULT-exec-time: user 0.3200 > TEST-RESULT-exec-real-time: real 0.3172 > > TEST-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft > TEST-RESULT-exec-time: user 0.4000 > TEST-RESULT-exec-real-time: real 0.4172 > make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE' > > TEST-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleS...

...1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 TEST-FAIL: exec /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/build/projects/llvm-test/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.stepfft' FAILED! ******************** Execution Context Diff: /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/build/Release/bin/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 TEST-FAIL: exec /home/greened/src/llvm-30-r...

Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> writes: > I'm not sure if this makes a difference but I ran this > > make -j 2 -k LLVMCC_OPTION=clang ENABLE_BUILT_CLANG=1 ENABLE_PARALLEL_REPORT=1 TEST=simple report > ../../report.txt 2>&1 That does indeed seem to get me further. Thanks! -Dave

...'e' and 'm' [i686-off-opt]: ******************** TEST (llc) 'sse.isamax' **************************** ========================= [i686-off-opt]: ./llvm.official/projects/llvm-test/DiffOutput.sh "/ptmp/dag/build.llvm.official/Release/bin/fpcmp -r 0.016" llc sse.stepfft [i686-off-opt]: ******************** TEST (llc) 'sse.stepfft' FAILED! ******************** [i686-off-opt]: Execution Context Diff: [i686-off-opt]: /ptmp/dag/build.llvm.official/Release/bin/fpcmp: FP Comparison failed, not a numeric difference between 'e' and 'f' [i686-off...

...^ no idea cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie ^^ cbe doesn't support inline asm (bzero lowering) jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots ^^ no idea llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2 llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build...

...> abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 > Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 > > TEST-FAIL: exec /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/build/projects/llvm-test/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft > > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.stepfft' FAILED! ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/build/Release/bin/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 > abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 > Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 > > TEST-FAIL: ex...

I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch. To check out the release branch: cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r

...H/ConditionalExpr SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2 SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft JIT failures in clang, pass in llvm-gcc: MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3 SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor 3. Some performance regressions GCC/LLC (2.6 -> 2.7), but keep in mind that I wasn't using GCC 4.4.3 as comparison for llvm 2.6! MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/h...

...ource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2 > SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block > SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore > SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft > SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft > > JIT failures in clang, pass in llvm-gcc: > MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3 > SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor > This isn't part of our release criteria. So, these are not release blockers. > 3. Some performance regressions GCC/LLC (2.6 -> 2.7), bu...

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Redmond, Paul <paul.redmond at intel.com> wrote: > There is almost certainly a bug in lnt or the makefiles. > > I changed the body of Burg main to the following: > > + printf("Hello World\n"); > + return 0; > > > I re-ran the test-suite again and got the following errors: > > --- Tested: 986 tests -- > FAIL:

The 2.7 binaries are available for testing: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.7/pre-release1/ You will also find the source tarballs there as well. We rely on the community to help make our releases great, so please help test 2.7 if you can. Please follow these instructions to test 2.7: To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it

There is almost certainly a bug in lnt or the makefiles. I changed the body of Burg main to the following: + printf("Hello World\n"); + return 0; I re-ran the test-suite again and got the following errors: --- Tested: 986 tests -- FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg.execution_time (494 of 986) FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.execution_time (495 of 986) FAIL:

.../EH/ctor_dtor_count-2 >> SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block >> SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw >> SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore >> SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft >> SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft >> >> JIT failures in clang, pass in llvm-gcc: >> MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3 >> SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor >> > > This isn't part of our release criteria. So, these are not release blockers. Ok, something to keep in mind for LLV...

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote: >> point taken. thanks! > > > Whatever I try I get something like this: > > ggreif$ cd MultiSource/ > ggreif$ make > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/ > burg.linked.rbc'. Stop. > make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2 > make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2 This is the

On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > heisenbug wrote: > > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote: > > > ... > > > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test > > >>>