search for: stepanov_v1p2

...oopack_v1p8.cpp 4.53 0.59 53582 1207 132972 llvm-g++ -O0 oopack_v1p8.cpp 4.92 0.59 7195 352 116256 g++-4.2 -O0 oopack_v1p8.cpp 4.97 0.58 7215 352 116256 g++-4.1 -O0 oopack_v1p8.cpp 5.45 0.70 8856 640 117440 icc -O0 stepanov_v1p2.cpp 1.01 1.09 64931 1600 33408 icc -O2 stepanov_v1p2.cpp 1.02 1.00 64471 1600 33408 icc -Os stepanov_v1p2.cpp 1.02 1.17 6519 340 32352 g++-4.2 -O2 stepanov_v1p2.cpp 1.07 1.18 6555 340 32352 g++-4.1 -O2 stepanov_v1p2...

....71 => 3.00) > singlesource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -382.67% (0.75 => 3.62) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake: 18.66% (11.90 => 9.68) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: -1811.11% (0.54 => 10.32) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2: 16.90% (25.33 => 21.05) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: -17.61% (3.18 => 3.74) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random: 5.51% (3.81 => 3.60) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: -25.67% (9.70 => 12.19) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 23.51...

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

...rce/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann...

...7 * 7.97 | 1.06 3.71 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake | 0.0709 12336 * * * | 24.24 * * * * | n/a n/a n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 | 0.1606 9508 0.0464 * 0.0446 | 15.01 14.75 11.67 * 12.47 | 1.02 1.29 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon | 0.1246 15612 0.0852 * 0.0817 |...

...1 * 10.59 | 0.87 2.58 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake | 0.0720 11016 * * * | 11.56 33.35 * * * | 0.35 n/a n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 | 0.1440 9288 0.0560 * 0.0600 | 18.20 41.94 15.47 * 14.35 | 0.43 1.18 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon | 0.1640 13232 0.0920 * 0.0880 |...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...1 * 6.83 | 0.82 2.52 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake | 0.0574 10972 * * * | 6.92 24.75 * * * | 0.28 n/a n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 | 0.1443 9268 0.0465 * 0.0474 | 13.06 29.84 10.89 * 11.67 | 0.44 1.20 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon | 0.0990 13240 0.0794 * 0.0732 |...

...5 * 5.32 | 0.89 1.36 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake | 0.0325 12352 0.0225 * 0.0228 | 3.59 8.39 4.20 * 4.64 | 0.43 0.85 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 | 0.1117 9672 0.0226 * 0.0230 | 9.26 15.67 9.27 * 9.50 | 0.59 1.00 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon | 0.0525 14536 0.0292 * 0.0372 |...

...|0.081900482| 0.14| 532366155| 0|0.081939047| 0.09| 532366154| 0| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container.test | 40|2.340649713| 5147979419|2.344395208| -0.16| 5147328718| 0.01|2.342970076| -0.1| 5147328716| 0.01| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2.test | 40|4.915020328|10294333477|4.916416816| -0.03|10294333467| 0|4.914229028| 0.02|10294333470| 0| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon.test | 40|2.810030776|34665032211| 2.8095424| 0.02|34665032204| 0|2.80996279...

....98 | 1.11    1.08    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container                      | > 0.2900 46332    0.1799      *                0.1899      |    4.29    4.40 >  4.30 *           4.68 | 0.97    1.00    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2                           | > 0.0800 10116    0.0500      *                0.0500      |    7.87    8.27 >  8.11 *           8.24 | 0.95    0.97    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon                                 | > 0.0799 10636    0.0600      *              ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ > stepanov_container | 0.2900 46332 > 0.1799 * 0.1899 | 4.29 4.40 4.30 > * 4.68 | 0.97 1.00 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ > stepanov_v1p2 | 0.0800 10116 > 0.0500 * 0.0500 | 7.87 8.27 8.11 > * 8.24 | 0.95 0.97 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ > ReedSolomon | 0.0799 10636 > 0.0600...

...80 0.1204 0.0004 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FProlangs-C%2B%2B%2Flife%2Flife.compile=on> > 2.01% 0.0844 0.0861 0.0006 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMisc-C%2B%2B%2Fstepanov_v1p2.compile=on> > 2.01% 0.1739 0.1774 0.0005 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nt...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

....ll 7 153843 0 0.02 153814 0 0.02 154514 stcopy.ll 3 7686 0 0.01 7652 0 0.01 7652 StdInStream.ll 9 29832 0 0.01 29805 0 0.01 29805 StdOutStream.ll 12 18089 0 0.01 18062 0 0.01 18062 stepanov_abstraction.ll 188 481183 24 0.05 489762 0 0.05 448404 stepanov_container.ll 330 668695 30 0.06 672872 * * * stepanov_v1p2.ll 127 172226 25 0.02 166489 0 0.02 178347 stepanov_vector.ll 209 521683 6 0.04 522153 * * * st.ll 113 202063 3 0.03 200965 0 0.03 179793 stmtexpr.ll 11 22838 1 0.01 22853 0 0.01 22827 Stopwatch.ll 8 10525 0 0.01 10505 0 0.01 10505 storage.ll 25 115739 0 0.02 115719 0 0.02 115719 store.ll 11 112741...