search for: stepanov_container

...62) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: -97.63% (1.0080 => 1.9921) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -171.51% (0.8280 => 2.2481) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: -43.51% (0.5240 => 0.7520) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: -110.33% (1.0080 => 2.1201) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq: -43.20% (0.5000 => 0.7160) > multisource/Applications/hbd/hbd: -31.91% (1.7801 => 2.3481) > multisource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: -18.78% (32.6580 => 38.7903) > multisource/Applications/minisa...

Hi Chris, > Can you check to see if the stepanov_container/fftbench regressions > are real? If so, it would be very interesting to know what is "going > wrong" on them. I think these may not be real. This version of llvm-gcc was built with checking enabled - does this turn on checking in libstdc++? It seems that a bunch of linkonce...

...folding: > 69.51% (6.92 => 2.11) > singlesource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -563.16% (0.57 => 3.78) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray: 6.45% (7.60 => 7.11) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake: 12.32% (6.09 => 5.34) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: -2438.89% (0.36 > => 9.14) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: -7.76% (3.61 => 3.89) > multisource/Applications/lambda-0.1.3/lambda: 18.24% (9.76 => 7.98) Can you check to see if the stepanov_container/fftbench regressions are real? If so, it would be very interesting t...

...ch functions were not present in old_version_of_program (they have a size of 0) - Which functions were not present in new_version_of_program (same idea) - Which functions grew the most - Which functions shrunk the most For a concrete example of the output, here’s some output I got by compiling the stepanov_container benchmark for AArch64 with -Os and -O3 respectively: https://hastebin.com/hucexocuxi.md <https://hastebin.com/hucexocuxi.md> If anyone is interested, feel free to try it out/review/etc. I think that a tool like this would be quite useful. :) - Jessica -------------- next part -------------...

...4.6491 > 4.9096 0.0183 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/403_gcc/403_gcc.compile 5.60% 75.1560 79.3658 0.1151 > MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser.compile 5.60% 3.0244 3.1938 0.0059 > External/SPEC/CINT95/130_li/130_li.compile 5.60% 1.6850 1.7793 0.0121 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container.compile 5.59% 0.9634 1.0173 > 0.0025 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/253_perlbmk/253_perlbmk.compile 5.58% 13.0643 13.7938 0.0156 > MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua.compile 5.56% 3.9109 4.1285 0.0105 > External/SPEC/CFP2006/444_namd/444_namd.compile 5.54% 6.8800 7.2614 0.0155 > MultiSource/...

...96 0.0183 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/403_gcc/403_gcc.compile 5.60% 75.1560 79.3658 0.1151 >> MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser.compile 5.60% 3.0244 3.1938 0.0059 >> External/SPEC/CINT95/130_li/130_li.compile 5.60% 1.6850 1.7793 0.0121 >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container.compile 5.59% 0.9634 1.0173 >> 0.0025 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/253_perlbmk/253_perlbmk.compile 5.58% 13.0643 13.7938 0.0156 >> MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua.compile 5.56% 3.9109 4.1285 0.0105 >> External/SPEC/CFP2006/444_namd/444_namd.compile 5.54% 6.8800 7.2614 0.0155 &...

Most of libc++ doesn't have explicit template instantiations, which leads to a pretty significant build time and code size cost when using libc++, since a large number of common templates will be emitted by the compiler and coalesced by the linker. Notably, in include/__config, we have: #ifndef _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE #define _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(...) #endif whereas before

...rg/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.297=3> 2.30% 0.4994 > 0.5109 0.0017 2.76% 0.0017 > MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.214=3> 2.22% 4.2109 > 4.3044 0.0044 2.95% 0.0044 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.372=3> 2.21% 0.6435 > 0.6577 0.0003 1.51% 0.0003 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.321=3> 2.04% 0.5012 > 0.5114 0.0004 1.61% 0.0004 > MultiSource...

...t/timberwolfmc -2.4% MultiSource/Applications/treecc/Output/treecc -2.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-jpeg/Output/consumer-jpeg -2.2% External/SPEC/CFP2006/450.soplex/Output/450.soplex -2.2% External/SPEC/CINT2000/186.crafty/Output/186.crafty -2.2% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Output/stepanov_container -2.1% External/SPEC/CINT2006/456.hmmer/Output/456.hmmer -2.1% External/SPEC/CINT2000/254.gap/Output/254.gap -2.0% MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/Output/lencod -2.0% MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/Output/pifft -1.9% External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/Output/447.dealII -1.9% External/SPEC/C...

...4/nts/1283/graph?test.297=3> 2.30% 0.4994 >> 0.5109 0.0017 2.76% 0.0017 >> MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.214=3> 2.22% 4.2109 >> 4.3044 0.0044 2.95% 0.0044 >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.372=3> 2.21% 0.6435 >> 0.6577 0.0003 1.51% 0.0003 >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.321=3> 2.04% 0.5012 >> 0.5114 0.0004 1.61% 0.0...

...t.297=3> 2.30% 0.4994 >>> 0.5109 0.0017 2.76% 0.0017 >>> MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.214=3> 2.22% 4.2109 >>> 4.3044 0.0044 2.95% 0.0044 >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.372=3> 2.21% 0.6435 >>> 0.6577 0.0003 1.51% 0.0003 >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.321=3> 2.04% 0.5012 >>> 0.5...

...4994 >>>> 0.5109 0.0017 2.76% 0.0017 >>>> MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.214=3> 2.22% 4.2109 >>>> 4.3044 0.0044 2.95% 0.0044 >>>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.372=3> 2.21% 0.6435 >>>> 0.6577 0.0003 1.51% 0.0003 >>>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.321=3> 2.04% 0.5012...

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

...rce/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 |...

...|1.093537162| 0.06| 5480623264| 0|1.093854114| 0.03| 5480623264| 0| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8.test | 256|0.082014067| 532366158|0.081900482| 0.14| 532366155| 0|0.081939047| 0.09| 532366154| 0| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container.test | 40|2.340649713| 5147979419|2.344395208| -0.16| 5147328718| 0.01|2.342970076| -0.1| 5147328716| 0.01| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2.test | 40|4.915020328|10294333477|4.916416816| -0.03|10294333467| 0|4.914229028| 0...

....20 | 1.04    1.02    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake                             | > 0.0799 16776    0.0799      *                0.0699      |    3.09    2.79 >  2.85 *           2.98 | 1.11    1.08    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container                      | > 0.2900 46332    0.1799      *                0.1899      |    4.29    4.40 >  4.30 *           4.68 | 0.97    1.00    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2                           | > 0.0800 10116    0.0500      *                0.0...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ > sphereflake | 0.0799 16776 > 0.0799 * 0.0699 | 3.09 2.79 2.85 > * 2.98 | 1.11 1.08 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ > stepanov_container | 0.2900 46332 > 0.1799 * 0.1899 | 4.29 4.40 4.30 > * 4.68 | 0.97 1.00 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ > stepanov_v1p2 | 0.0800 10116 > 0.0500 *...

...gt; 1.66% 15.2642 15.5174 0.0333 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/NPB-serial/is/is.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FNPB-serial%2Fis%2Fis.compile=on> > 1.65% 0.0726 0.0738 0.0003 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMisc-C%2B%2B%2Fstepanov_container.compile=on> > 1.65% 0.9234 0.9386 0.0011 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/s...

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,