search for: stefomeister

On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 13:01, Stefan Stipanovic <stefomeister at gmail.com> wrote: > Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? It's not. More people were added as moderators to curb the problem instead. Are you having trouble joining the channel?

Is the channel now purposefully invite-only? If so, how is one supposed to join? Thanks, Stefan On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:23 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:03, Ryan Houdek <sonicadvance1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll comment from the perspective of someone that is in the Mesa, > #dri-devel, #radeon

Hi all, A while back we started annotating intrinsics with new attributes ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D65377) After some discussion it was decided it would be good to have an `opt-out` attribute list for intrinsics. Some attributes that can be added to the list could be: nosync, nofree, nounwind, willreturn For now, there are 2 approaches: 1. Filtering opt-out attributes in tablegen source (

...try to work on AAReachability TODO after > solving this issue. > > Thanks and Regards > > > References > > [1] https://youtu.be/HVvvCSSLiTw > [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/179 > > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:12 PM Stefan Stipanovic <stefomeister at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Fahad, >> >> >>> > Improve dynamic memory related capabilities of Attributor. For example >>> Improve HeapToStackConversions. Maybe such deductions can help safety >>> (dis)provers. For example, can we improve t...

Hi Fahad, > > Improve dynamic memory related capabilities of Attributor. For example > Improve HeapToStackConversions. Maybe such deductions can help safety > (dis)provers. For example, can we improve the use-after-free bug detection > using some attributes? > Stefan should know more about H2S. Regarding the use-after-free, I don't > think there's currently any plans