Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "steffenvogel".
2014 Aug 06
1
State graph of UDP data-connections
...es' ?!
Regards,
Steffen
[1] http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation-1.1/The-meta_002dconnection.html
[2] http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation-1.1/The-meta_002dprotocol.html
[3] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/2009-April/001901.html
--
Steffen Vogel
Robensstra?e 69
52070 Aachen
Mail: post at steffenvogel.de
Mobil: +49 1575 7180927
Web: http://www.steffenvogel.de
Jabber: steffen.vogel at jabber.rwth-aachen.de
-------------- n?chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Bin?rdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname : signature.asc
Dateityp : application/pgp-signature
Dateigr??e : 819 bytes
Beschr...
2014 Dec 05
3
two tinc hosts behind same NAT
Dear all,
I have 3 nodes: A, B and C. C has external IP and A and B are behind NAT.
It turns out A and B route their traffic via the C, which they ConnectTo
with; this instead of getting connection details from one another and
contacting eachother directly (mesh style). The reason is, as I conclude
from tincd debug output, is that they see the peer as having a minimum MTU
of 0. I suspect this is
2014 Dec 05
1
Schedule for 1.1 final?
Hi,
I?m curious when we will see the final release of Tinc 1.1?
Are there some critical issues which still need to be fixed?
The repo does not show some active development for the past months..
Cheers,
Steffen
2014 Dec 05
0
two tinc hosts behind same NAT
Hi Eric,
Which version are you using? I have similar issues with the newest 1.1pre10.
Did you check out the ?LocalDiscovery? option?
For 1.1, you also can get more information about the actual connection mode by using the ?info [node]? command.
Cheers,
Steffen
> Am 05.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Eric Feliksik <feliksik at gmail.com>:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have 3 nodes: A, B