search for: steamroll

...[table(n0)>N]))) Some of the factor levels may be empty for one of the factors but the same level must be present in the other. Is there a simple way to extract nn0 and nn1 so that the pairs remain correctly aligned and each list has at least N cases of each name? Or do I have to jump into my steamroller and do a couple of loops? TIA John -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the...

> Again, this is a decision the LLVM community needs to make based on its own cost/benefit analysis. We often don't start new projects with mature code -- in fact, doing that is an unusual case. I can't speak for every new project, but the ones I've followed closely (OMP hell) I can say that not a single piece of code was accepted without a fight and that it was meant to be

Hi Jason, The long discussion made me wondering where this was going, but re-reading you original email [0], there was an acknowledgment of a potential future merge between the projects, and I can of make sense of the current picture. So you can forget about my question below! [0]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096576.html

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > You get the code you want with > > > > @foo = external hidden global i8 > > > > or > > > > @foo = external protected global i8 > > Sorry, not quiet. What you get is > > leaq foo(%rip), %rax > > Since it is still assuming foo is a

> You get the code you want with > > @foo = external hidden global i8 > > or > > @foo = external protected global i8 Sorry, not quiet. What you get is leaq foo(%rip), %rax Since it is still assuming foo is a position in the file. So yes, we need a way to declare an absolute value. If we can declare it, we may as well use the same construct to define it. I guess the

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > Docker will eat away at this problem going forward. You naturally will not already have Dockerized versions of apps built 10 years ago, and it may not be practical to create them now, but you can start insisting on getting them today so that your future OS changes don?t break things for you again. > Yes,

...metadata and support it on > GlobalConstant as well as GlobalVariable > > Although I am not convinced that this is the right representation I appear > to be in the minority here, so if this seems reasonable to folks I will go > ahead and implement it. > > > I’m not trying to steamroll you over: what is your specific concern? > My specific concern is pointer modeling. I think Chandler put it well in his most recent mail. Thanks, -- -- Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachmen...

...Unix vs Linux, the PC vs the smartphone? Time and time again, the forces driving the end-user market end up taking over the hrumph hrumph serious computing market. This has already happened with JS vs Java in the ?3 billion? space Oracle wants to claim, and I see no reason why it can?t eventually steamroll the *ix world, too, via node.js. Even if you wave a magic wand and get the JVM onto every *ix box ? which is currently very much *not* the case ? you?re ignoring the Tiobe numbers I posted in the previous reply. There?s plenty to argue about when it comes to Tiobe?s methodology, but not so much t...

...range we should use !range metadata and support it on GlobalConstant as well as GlobalVariable > > Although I am not convinced that this is the right representation I appear to be in the minority here, so if this seems reasonable to folks I will go ahead and implement it. I’m not trying to steamroll you over: what is your specific concern? -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161025/1d590327/attachment.html>

...then can start posting patches > based on the charter and other stuff you've already worked up. > > (Also happy for folks who've been keeping silent to chime in with more > opinions! Just assuming that most don't have strong feelings either way at > this point.) yay for steamroller approach without actually addressing any of my valid concerns. I'd expect nothing less from you Chandler, nice job.. It's not like they will be contributing code to this area and or have contributed much to the areas of offloading. (Sorry Hal, but I may be mistaken in your case.. I'd...

...it scales to the other end as well. > Time and time again, the forces driving the end-user market end up taking over the hrumph hrumph serious computing market. This has already happened with JS vs Java in the ?3 billion? space Oracle wants to claim, and I see no reason why it can?t eventually steamroll the *ix world, too, via node.js. node.js seems like the worst of all worlds - a language designed _not_ to speak to the OS directly with an OS library glued in. But it is a good example of how programmers think - if one says you shouldn't do something, it pretty much guarantees that someone e...