search for: stavrev

...that goes out of eighter LAN NIC into IMQ device and impose QoS policy on top of it. This will allow to use in the most efficient manner all available WAN bandwidth. Is there any patch for 2.4.x kernel that allows multiple (cascading) queuing ? Is this limitation exists in 2.6 kernel ? Thanks M. Stavrev P.S. I know I can easily solve my problems by using two linux boxes - one for frottle and one for the internet shaping, still my question remains, any ideas would be appreciated. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/ma...

...g a caching proxy pretty much. After lots of googling and reading(at one point I was ready to completely forget squid) a came up with the following alternatives, both found on the FAQ section of www.docum.org - ''SQUID zero penalty for HIT traffic patch'' by a fellow bulgarian Marin Stavrev, and a patch giving you the ability to ''use ACL lists to put packets in classes'' by a guy named Patrick. I''d like to ask you for your experiences with those, which one is better, any other alternatives you know of and of course general recipes/recommendations for solving...

Hi, I need to simulate (with a certain degree of control) common WAN problems like packet loss/duplication, delay and conditions of limited bandwidth. I found that NISTNet is what i need, but it seems the package has not been updated since October, 2000. This is not really a problem as I found NISTNet runs perfectly with Linux kernels up to 2.4.23 (officially 2.4.18 is the latest mentioned in

Hi, I was reviewing the patch Patrick McHardy has contributed to squid QoS features (http://trash.net/~kaber/squid-qos/), and decided to do something similar which could classify client side traffic based on whether SQUID''s response is a cache HIT or a cache MISS. I think I got it working. I made a quick home page for this patch, so anyone interested in trying it can learn more here: