Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "statux".
Did you mean:
status
2002 May 15
2
when is fsck required?
Hi,
can anyone give me an example of
when an fsck would repair something
that the ext3 driver would not? with
full "data=journal" journaling, would
fsck ever need to be run if all the
partitions were ext3?
the ext3 mini-howto refers to "certain
rare hardware failure cases (e.g. hard
drive failures)" that would require a
filesystem check, but doesn't go into
details.
2001 Nov 13
3
Alpha compile warning
Getting this warning compiling on an alpha, is it a problem?
2.4.15-pre4
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/users/donjr/linux-2.4.15-pre4/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev5
-Wa,-mev6 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c journal.c
journal.c: In function `journal_init_inode':
journal.c:758: warning: long long
2002 May 12
3
ext3 .journal location?
Forgive my novice question, but I am a new student of Linux working on presenting the ext3 journaling filesystem to my class. I seek any advice on how to visibly demonstrate (including a purposeful crash of a Linux box) the benefits of ext3 over ext2. I am not worthy to lick the bootstraps of this group, but I beg for any help! The problem I am having extends to even locating the .journal file
2001 Nov 19
2
df report
'df' doesn't report my root partition, but does report my
/boot partition when both are mounted with <type> auto. But
when mounted with <type> ext3, both partitions are reported.
Details:
The system has mount-2.11m, tune2fs-1.25 and df (fileutils) 4.1
I just created an ext3 fs on a new Debian Woody install initially
running linux-2.2.19 on ext2, but upgraded to