search for: status_share_violation

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_...

...modes. I'd be happy to analyze this further and assist you in making a proper GPFS query out of this if needed. With best regards, Volker Lendecke On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Gast wrote: > Hi, > > in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". > > Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) > Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) > > Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X a...

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Alexander Gast wrote: > I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. > Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: > > Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): > https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 > >

...ast at wdr.de www.wdr.de Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt, bevor Sie diese E-Mail drucken. >>> Von: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE> An:Alexander Gast <Alexander.Gast at WDR.DE> CC:<samba at lists.samba.org> Datum: 04.06.2015 08:47 Betreff: Re: [Samba] STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION when Read while Write on GPFS + CTDB Hello! We indeed need debug level 10 logs of smbd. But I bet that you're running into an incompatibility between SMB and GPFS share modes. Those don't match 100%, so turning off gpfs:sharemodes might be worth a try. Of course, this means that you lose i...