Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "stats10".
Did you mean:
stats1
2010 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Inliner
On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Hi, I browsed the LLVM inliner implementation, and it seems there is room for improvement. (I have not read it too carefully, so correct me if what I observed is wrong).
>
> First the good side of the inliner -- the function level summary and inline cost estimation is more elaborate and complete than gcc. For instance, it considers
2010 Nov 24
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM Inliner
Hi, I browsed the LLVM inliner implementation, and it seems there is room
for improvement. (I have not read it too carefully, so correct me if what I
observed is wrong).
First the good side of the inliner -- the function level summary and inline
cost estimation is more elaborate and complete than gcc. For instance, it
considers callsite arguments and the effects of optimization enabled by