search for: statlab

I think I have a data.frame called "statlab". > is.data.frame(statlab) [1] TRUE and I can perform summary, dim, ... but when I try > attach(statlab) Error in attach(statlab) : attach only works for lists and data frames I am using > version _ platform i686-unknown-linux arch i686...

biplot could benefit from allowing colour palettes, eg. allowing col=list(xcol= xxpal, ycol= yypal) where xxpal and yypal are palettes. For an example, see the robust pricipal components in the principal componetent section of <http://www.statlab.uni-heidelberg.de/data/olive/olive10.pdf> The required change is to replace col[1L] resp. col[2L] by col[1L]] reep. col[[2L]] for example in plot(x, type = "n", xlim = xlim, ylim = ylim, col = col[[1L]], ## << xlab = xlab, ylab = ylab, sub = sub, main = main, ...)...

...ressed first? I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more recently in https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf, pointing to the python implementation for comparison: https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 Thanks! Carl -- http://carlboettiger.info [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

How do I parse an identifier of a list component, e.g. mylist$mycomponent or mylist[[1]] ? Parse does not do the job, e.g. parse(text="mylist$mycomponent") returns an expression with just one term, instead of "mylist", "$", "mycomponent". What I need is a way to extract the list name (e.g. "mylist"), given an identifier of a component.

...d by Killie & Philip in > > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more > > recently in > > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf, > > pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > > I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default > is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce > older results. > > On the other hand, a contribution of a new functi...

...http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more > >>> recently in > >>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf, > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > >>> > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > >> > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default > >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce > >> older results. > >> > >...

I've put all ``current'' add-on packages into CRAN's source/contrib tree and created an INDEX file (attached below). As you can see, currently we have acepack bootstrap ctest date e1071 fracdiff gee jpn snns splines survival4 (Yes, e1071 and jpn are new ... more on the latter in a later mail.) In the near future, I am hoping for the following: oz (Bill

...ww.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf > > < > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>, > > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > > >>> > > > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > > >> > > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the > > default > > >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to > > repr...

...this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more > recently in > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf, > pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce older results. On the other hand, a contribution of a new function like sample() but not...

Couse notes for a short introduction to the S language have been posted as <http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/contrib/s.pdf;I> This is material for a 4-5 days course, assuming some background in statistics (German style). As a matter of fact it is a Trojan horse, claiming it is teaching the S language, but under the shelf it is trying to convey some ideas about statistics. For those

Couse notes for a short introduction to the S language have been posted as <http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/contrib/s.pdf;I> This is material for a 4-5 days course, assuming some background in statistics (German style). As a matter of fact it is a Trojan horse, claiming it is teaching the S language, but under the shelf it is trying to convey some ideas about statistics. For those

The newest version of R for Unix (version R-0.50-a4) is now (or will soon be) available from the following sites. NORTH AMERICA: http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/Alpha EUROPE: ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/R/ ftp://statlab.uni-heidelberg.de/pub/mirrors/auckland/R/ JAPAN: ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/lang/R/ NEW ZEALAND: ftp://stat.auckland.ac.nz/pub/R/ Please obtain a copy from site close to you. Note that New Zealand is not close to anywhere other than itself :-). This is a quick snapshot...

...p; Philip in >>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more >>> recently in >>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf, >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison: >>> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 >> >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce >> older results. >> >> On the other hand, a cont...

...>> > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf > <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>, > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > >>> > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > >> > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the > default > >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to > reproduce > >>...

...> > > > < > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>, > > > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > > > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > > > >> > > > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change > > to the > > > default > > > >> is likely to be accepted as...

Hi folks, Ubuntu 7.04 desktop IEs4Linux IE6 Download following packages on Internet; msjavx86b3805.exe MSJavWU_8073687b82d41db93f4c2a04af2b34d.exe I suppose "wine MSJavWU_8073687b82d41db93f4c2a04af2b34d.exe" is upgrade. On terminal: $ WINEPREFIX="/home/satimis/.ies4linux/ie6" wine msjavx86b3805.exe .... ..... Backtrace: =>1 0x00be006e (0x0034fe18) 2 0x7bc3ac3d in

...rints/r-random-issues.pdf> > > > ?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>, > >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison: > >? ? ? >>> > > > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > >? ? ? >> > >? ? ? >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change > to the > >? ? ?default > >? ? ? >> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more &g...

...tat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>, > > > > >>> pointing to the python implementation for > comparison: > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 > > > > >> > > > > >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a > > change > > > to the > > > > default > &g...

I am trying to get R 1.0 running on the Mac. The main target is MacX. Anyone else working on that? For the recent Macintosh system, I am trying to compile R using MachTen. The R core compiles and runs without any changes, using the Unix make files. The libraries give some problems, presumably due to handling of shared libraries. It seems I am missing something to link. Before I spend my time

...keley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>, >> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for >> comparison: >> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> >> ???? >? ? ? > >> ???? > >> ??? >> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265 >> >> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >> >> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a >> ??? change >> ???? >? ? ?to the >> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ?default &gt...