search for: staticanalyzer

Hello everyone! After I've checked out Clang and Compiler-RT repositories, I receive this error during compilation: llvm[5]: Compiling PathDiagnostic.cpp for Debug+Asserts build /media/data/dev/llvm/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathDiagnostic.cpp: In member function 'bool {anonymous}::CompareDiagnostics::operator()(const clang::ento::PathDiagnostic*, const clang::ento::PathDiagnostic*) const': /media/data/dev/llvm/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathDiagnostic.cpp:224:23: error: no match for 'ope...

...09/09/12 03:36, Vadim Khoptynets wrote: > Hello everyone! > > After I've checked out Clang and Compiler-RT repositories, I receive this error > during compilation: > > llvm[5]: Compiling PathDiagnostic.cpp for Debug+Asserts build > /media/data/dev/llvm/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathDiagnostic.cpp: In > member function 'bool {anonymous}::CompareDiagnostics::operator()(const > clang::ento::PathDiagnostic*, const clang::ento::PathDiagnostic*) const': > /media/data/dev/llvm/llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathDiagnostic.cpp:224:23: > error: n...

...olchain. FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently running the tests. Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link: cd "/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers" && /usr/bin/g++-5 -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_OBJC_REWRITER -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer...

...chine (binutils >> 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently >> running the tests. >> >> Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link: >> cd >> "/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build-llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers" >> && /usr/bin/g++-5 -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT -DCLANG_ENABLE_OBJC_REWRITER >> -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS >> -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS >> -I"/«BUILDDIR»/llvm-toolchain-3.8-3.8.1~+rc1/build...

Hi dear list, Since yesterday my new alpha checker had landed thus ready to test if you find any use for it ! Should work out of the box for most of posix systems. Cheers. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180302/0d269d81/attachment.html>

...r to CFG object for this code in order to traverse basic blocks and do some analysis using CFG object. From my main program main.cpp, how can I get pointer to CFG object if argv[1] = hello.c ? I have seen following places among many in clang/lib or clang/include: llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/DebugCheckers.cpp:96 - calls checkASTCodeBody(const Decl *D, AnalysisManager& mgr, BugReporter &BR) if (CFG *cfg = mgr.getCFG(D)) call cfg->dump() llvm-3.1.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:472 - AnalysisConsumer::HandleCode(Decl *D, A...

...ut the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘if’ if (ParseUseListOrderBB()) return true; break; ^~~~~ ``` and ``` /home/dsl11/dev/llvm-upstream/src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckObjCDealloc.cpp: In member function ‘void {anonymous}::ObjCDeal locChecker::diagnoseMissingReleases(clang::ento::CheckerContext&) const’: /home/dsl11/dev/llvm-upstream/src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckObjCDealloc.cpp:532:5: warning: this ‘if’ clause does not guar...

...er a branch is definitely true or false (i.e. whether the constraints are satisfiable), thus preventing exponential blowup of the analysis. However, when I was looking through the github version of LLVM, it seems like z3 is already incorporated: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Z3ConstraintManager.cpp I guess my question is, what would the project contribute on top of the z3 manager that is currently implemented for LLVM? Thanks! Brenda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/atta...

James, > [ 94%] [ 94%] Building CXX object > tools/clang/tools/libclang/CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/IndexingContext.cpp.o > Building CXX object > tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CMakeFiles/clangStaticAnalyzerCore.dir/M > emRegion.cpp.o > Linking CXX shared library ../../../../lib/liblibclang.so I am suspicious, I guess you might not enable optimization on cmake build. 1) make sure with "make VERBOSE=1" 2) make sure you would set proper CMAKE_BUILD_TY...

Hi, I've tagged 3.8.1-rc1, testers can begin testing. -Tom

Hi Tim, You seem to be working around BLX support on ARM, and this linker error has cropped up on our buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh/builds/3526 llvm/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp: (.text._ZN5clang4ento24ProgramStatePartialTraitIN4llvm12ImmutableMapIPKNS0_7SymExprEN12_GLOBAL__N_111ReallocPairENS2_16ImutKeyValueInfoIS6_S8_EEEEE13DeleteContextEPv+0x88): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 against symbol `operator delete(void*)@@GLIBCXX_3....

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:24 AM, James Molloy wrote: > Hi Paul, > > That should be easy enough, because the LLVM build has no warnings in it! > > Some of us build with -Werror, and even with those of us that don't warnings are not tolerated. You're already seeing all the warnings that are coming out of the build :) So, all the "variable might be used

...orCompareOperands(clang::ExprResult&, clang::ExprResult&, clang::SourceLocation, bool)’: /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:6698:12: warning: variable ‘RHSType’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp: In member function ‘clang::ento::SVal {anonymous}::RegionStoreManager::RetrieveStruct(clang::ento::Store, const clang::ento::TypedValueRegion*)’: /home/greened/src/llvm-30-rc3/clang-3.0rc3.src/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:1280:12: warning: variable ‘T’ set but not u...

On 3 Apr 2013, at 18:42, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > I'm not sure how difficult it actually is to follow ToT compared to one huge pain when upgrading for our full releases. I think it would be valuable to obtain feedback from projects that rely on LLVM as to how they go about integrating LLVM into their project and how our releases (and potentially dot-releases) would

Are you doing this to enable optimizations, or to detect bugs? If the former, dealing with LLVM IR is probably your best bet, and you may find this to be helpful: http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html. If the latter, you probably want to hook into clang's StaticAnalyzer. I'm not familiar with whether or not you'd be able to do AA with it, but AFAIK it retains the full C/C++ AST (LLVM IR doesn't), so your diagnostics would likely be a lot better with that. :) On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jingyue Wu via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wr...

On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: > >        http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ > > for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your

...nfo.h > lib/Basic/Targets.cpp > lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp > lib/Driver/HostInfo.cpp > lib/Driver/Tools.cpp > lib/Driver/Driver.cpp > lib/Driver/ToolChains.h > lib/Driver/Tools.h > lib/Driver/ToolChains.cpp > lib/Frontend/InitHeaderSearch.cpp > ... and maybe: > lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckSecuritySyntaxOnly.cpp > > It could be nice to add a target by just creating a target > configuration file (with everything in one file), maybe using plain > text files or tablegen. My guess is that many targets are similar in > different aspects, so some form of i...

Good day, LLVMers! We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release. Please keep

...clangSerialization [ 77%] Built target clangFrontend [ 77%] Built target clangRewriteFrontend [ 77%] Built target clangFrontendTool [ 77%] Built target clangTooling [ 77%] Built target clangToolingCore [ 77%] Built target clangToolingRefactor [ 77%] Built target clangIndex [ 78%] Built target clangStaticAnalyzerCore [ 83%] Built target clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers [ 83%] Built target clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend [ 83%] Built target clangFormat [ 85%] Built target diagtool [ 85%] Built target clang-offload-bundler [ 85%] Linking CXX executable ../../../../bin/clang /home/yawmoo/Desktop/clfs/llvm-cross-tools-l...

...[ 77%] Built target clangRewriteFrontend >> [ 77%] Built target clangFrontendTool >> [ 77%] Built target clangTooling >> [ 77%] Built target clangToolingCore >> [ 77%] Built target clangToolingRefactor >> [ 77%] Built target clangIndex >> [ 78%] Built target clangStaticAnalyzerCore >> [ 83%] Built target clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers >> [ 83%] Built target clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend >> [ 83%] Built target clangFormat >> [ 85%] Built target diagtool >> [ 85%] Built target clang-offload-bundler >> [ 85%] Linking CXX executable ../../../../...