Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "static_visitor".
Did you mean:
static_visitors
2008 Sep 29
2
[LLVMdev] Integer handling
...nteger as unsigned (where-as
if it is in the llvm::Type part of the variant it is treated as
signed), and a few other things. The other things include basically
any type that can hold any other type, from arrays to structs and so
forth. It was easy enough, I had made on the order of a crap-ton of
static_visitors to handle the variant in all its very fast, but still
overwhelming uglyness. I have got to the point where I need need to
represent the function type, this has suddenly introduced a whole new
class of uglyness to handle as the types can propagate into the blocks
and so forth.
I am just wondering...