Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "state_main_i1".
Did you mean:
state_main_i2
2014 Mar 07
2
Latest openswan update does no longer connect to Cisco VPN 3000 Series
...6.32-27.2.el6_5.i686 ? In our case a connection to Cisco VPN
3000 Series would no longer work. I can see in the log an ASSERTION FAILED
error and the connection would remain in Pending phase 2.
Mar 7 16:24:40 firewall pluto[7647]: "ciscovpntest" #2: discarding
duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I1
Mar 7 16:24:53 firewall pluto[7647]: "ciscovpntest" #2: received Vendor ID
payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] method set to=106
Mar 7 16:24:53 firewall pluto[7647]: "ciscovpntest" #2: ignoring Vendor ID
payload [FRAGMENTATION c0000000]
Mar 7 16:24:53 firewall pluto[764...
2005 May 23
3
Betr.: VPN
IF you are not stuck to IPSec, you might want to take a look at OpenVPN (www.openvpn.org). I found OpenVPN easier to install than FreeSWAN (an IPSEC VPN) and have setup an OpenVPN solution between my German office and our mainoffice in a matter of hours.
Thom van der Boon
E-Mail: Thom.van.der.Boon at vdb.nl
=====
Thom.H. van der Boon b.v.
Havens 563
Jan Evertsenweg 2-4
NL-3115 JA Schiedam
2007 Jul 05
2
Re: [strongSwan] Interop problem Linksys WRV200 with Strongswan 4.1.3 / PSK
...gt;> has no tunnel entry to correspond to this tunnel.
>> 006 [Thu 16:19:31] "TunnelA" #92: [WRV200 Response:] Please check
>> your Remote Secure Gateway setting.
>> 007 [Thu 16:19:31] "TunnelA" #92: max number of retransmissions
>> (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No response (or no acceptable response)
>> to our first IKE message
>> 008 [Thu 16:19:31] "TunnelA" #92: starting keying attempt 2 of at
>> most 5, but releasing whack
>> 009 [Thu 16:19:31] "TunnelA" #93: initiating Main Mode to replace #92
>...